Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 5, 2018 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she would like to see the dewatenng happen; it may <br />not work, but it is a good faith effort on the problem By the time staff can contract for <br />the dewatering Fielding will get a few weeks of good data. She thinks dewatering in <br />conjunction with testing is a good next step. <br />Members agreed to begin the monitoring and also get bids on dewatering. <br />Mayor Muckle moved to approve the contract with Terracon, Councilmember Loo <br />second <br />Vote: Motion passed 5-0, Mayor Pro Tem Lipton recused <br />Mayor Muckle moved to begin a process to get bids for the dewatering; Councilmember <br />Stolzmann seconded. Voice vote; all in favor. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION/ACTION — OVERDUE FINES FOR CHILDREN'S PRINT <br />MATERIALS <br />Intenm Director Becky Campbell stated staff and the Library Board of Trustees are <br />recommending the elimination of overdue fines for children's print materials in support <br />of encouraging and reinforcing reading readiness for all children in our community. <br />The subprogram goals of Library Services include the directive to practice to reinforce <br />the skills needed for reading readiness with young children so that they are poised to be <br />successful learners when they enter school For several years, libraries across the <br />country have been discussing eliminating fees on materials and in particular on <br />children's print materials Daily fines tend to add up more quickly on children's books as <br />families check out many books at a time. This can affect lower income families <br />disproportionately Data shows children who qualify for free or reduced lunch are <br />already at a reading disadvantage. <br />Staff feels the $10,000 per year in revenue in overdue fines on these materials seems a <br />modest amount to invest in the reading ability of our children The Library Board of <br />Trustees (LBoT) also supports the change to these fees <br />Public Comments — None <br />Councilmember Loo stated she disagrees with this proposal. She noted no other <br />members in the Flatirons Library Consortium (FLC) currently exempt these materials <br />from fines except for Boulder and they have done it for 20 years. 92% of libranes still <br />charge overdue fines; only 5% are not charging for children's materials. Under the <br />current proposal, taking out the ability to renew, you could go four weeks without fines. <br />At the end of four weeks, you would be sent to a collections agency and charged the full <br />cost of the overdue book. She saw little difference in fnendliness between the existing <br />policy and the proposed new one. She added there is no real data equating fine <br />elimination with reading success. <br />