My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2018 03 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2018 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2018 03 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:20 PM
Creation date
4/27/2018 10:57:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2018 03 19
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 14, 2017 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />Ulm stated that he was persuaded by the argument that the sign was an entry element <br />to the city. <br />Chuck Thomas added that it was certainly iconic. <br />Trice clarified that the Commission was providing comments for Council, not motioning <br />for approval. <br />Dickinson stated that he thought it was important that the Council know that the <br />commissioners appreciated the application. He stated that it was a respectful way to <br />respect the Blue Parrot and the corner of Pine and Main streets. <br />Ulm made a motion that the Historic Preservation Commission comments about the <br />sign were in accord with the design intent and the aesthetics presented in the PUD <br />application and that the Commission recommended the addition of an interpretive sign <br />similar to the Rex Theatre signage giving a history of what was on that site previously. <br />Chuck Thomas seconded. Roll call vote. Passed unanimously. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Landmark Open House <br />Staff revisited the idea of holding an informal HPC event outside of a City facility. Commissioner <br />Cyndi Thomas had offered her landmarked home to host an open house. If this is something the <br />Historic Preservation Commission would like to pursue, there are a few guidelines to ensure that <br />an open house complies with open government requirements: <br />1. Only two HPC members can attend. <br />2. HPC members cannot discuss any current projects, make pre -judgements, or otherwise <br />violate the quasi-judicial rules. <br />3. Staff can attend the open house and provide marketing materials. <br />Cyndi Thomas asked if commissioners could be at different houses at the same time on a <br />historic -house tour. <br />Dickinson agreed that an open -house tour might be more appealing than a single open house, <br />anyway. <br />Trice added that the Commission had to make sure the event would not be considered a <br />meeting due to the City's charter rules of open government. <br />Ulm stated that it would be financially efficient as well to hold a tour. <br />Cyndi Thomas stated that they could hold it in May for Preservation Month. She asked if they <br />could combine the event with the Art Walk. <br />Dickinson responded that he thought they would have trouble getting visitors to leave the Art <br />Walk area and go on a tour. He added that the open house could include works in progress, <br />such as his house at 721 Grant Avenue. <br />Trice suggested that the commissioners compile a list of possible times and locations. She <br />added that the tour could be an alternative to the farmers' market, as the Commission was <br />moving away from those events this summer. <br />Cyndi Thomas and Dickinson volunteered to come up with the list. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.