My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2018 03 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2018 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2018 03 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:20 PM
Creation date
4/27/2018 10:57:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2018 03 19
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 14, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />REFERRAL <br />The Corner PUD <br />The Commission requested a referral process for the Corner PUD in their previous <br />Commission meeting. The Historic Preservation Commission can provide comments on <br />the PUD requirements. <br />The Corner PUD application contemplates a sign program that will allow a new sign that <br />mimics the shape and certain iconic design elements of the existing Blue Parrot sign at <br />640 Main Street. The PUD requires that the new sign shall be the same size, shape, <br />and material as the existing sign, and utilize exposed neon elements and marquee <br />bulbs for illumination. The design shall also incorporate the arrow at the bottom of the <br />sign in all sign designs. The PUD also limits the overall character and logo heights. The <br />PUD regulates the shape and the size, not the color or the font. It has been requested <br />that the Commission make a consensus so that it can be forwarded to Council. <br />Chuck Thomas asked if the overall dimensions were the same as the original sign. <br />Trice confirmed that they were. <br />Cyndi Thomas suggested that there would be a plaque on the building addressing the <br />original Blue Parrot sign. <br />Dickinson concurred with Cyndi Thomas and thought the signage could address the <br />entire building instead of just the sign. He thought the applicant incorporated the old <br />sign well. <br />Parris added that she understood that the applicant was not required to incorporate <br />visual elements of the original sign and that they had done a good job of nodding to the <br />original sign. She agreed that there should be signage about the original sign. <br />Trice stated that the signage could be similar to the sign at the Rex Theatre that stated <br />that the original curtain was now housed the museum. <br />Ulm stated that he did not think the applicant needed to have the same size and <br />dimensions as the original sign. <br />Chuck Thomas stated that he was grateful to the owners for making the sign similar to <br />the original sign, even though they did not have to. He did not have a problem with <br />emulating the old sign, but he agreed with Ulm that the sign did not have to be a direct <br />copy. <br />Dickinson stated that an illuminated sign in that location made you feel like you were on <br />Main Street. Losing the old sign was sad and a close facsimile was a good move. He <br />added that the did not think the proposed sign look like the Blue Parrot sign, but anyone <br />who knew the original sign would appreciate the nods to the old signage. <br />Chuck Thomas added that it was a similar idea to the Empire sign refurbishment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.