My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2018 04 18
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2018 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2018 04 18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:03:13 PM
Creation date
4/27/2018 11:23:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2018 04 18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 15, 2017 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />Williams reviewed the procedures for the meeting; opened the public hearing; and <br />stated there are six criteria which must be met for the board to approve a variance <br />request. <br />Williams stated that for the requested variance to be approved, five (5) of the six (6) <br />votes would need to be affirmative. <br />Williams then stated copies of the criteria are located on the table next to entryway. <br />She asked for verification of proper public notice. <br />Ritchie verified the application to be heard that evening was complete. The application <br />was posted in City Hall, Public Library, Recreation Center, and the Courts and Police <br />Building on September 1, 2017, mailed to the surrounding property owners on <br />September 1, 2017, and published in the Boulder Daily Camera on September 3, 2017. <br />Ewy moved and Meseck seconded a motion that all requirements have been satisfied <br />and the application submitted by the applicants has been properly filed. Motion passed <br />by unanimous voice vote. <br />Williams asked if anyone at the hearing had any objections to the hearing procedures <br />she had described and asked if there were any other preliminary matters that needed to <br />be taken care of. None were heard. <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: <br />Williams asked for disclosures from the board members for any site visits, ex parte <br />communications, and any conflicts of interest or required disclosures on the application. <br />All Board members indicated they did not have any ex parte communications or any <br />conflicts of interest for the application. <br />Ewy discloses to the board that she has worked with the applicant's architect, Andy <br />Johnson, DAJ Design, on another project. Ewy was not present at the September <br />meeting that reviewed 812 La Farge Avenue's first proposal but since then has listened <br />to the meeting. <br />Williams asked the applicants if they were ready to proceed with the hearing. <br />The applicants indicated they were ready to proceed with the hearing. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />Ritchie reviewed the location of the property, summarized the application, and the <br />changes that the applicant made following the hearing on September 20, 2017. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.