My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 05 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 05 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 8:22:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 05 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 1,2018 <br />Page 10 of 13 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann agreed with Councilmember Maloney. This is about <br />communication to the public but is also for Council to understand success and directors <br />to manage their areas. When she looks closely at the KPIs in the areas where she <br />hears complaints, these KPIs should tell us if we are doing well or not. She stated all <br />sheets need more data, particularly those that have not changed from previous years. <br />Previous year's information should be in all versions. All of the KPIs relate to FTEs, <br />budget costs, and financial data and we need all that information with the KPIs. She <br />requested each effectiveness measurement also needs a target number listed so we <br />know if we are meeting the goal. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated he views this as a continual work in progress. It is getting <br />better but how we define success is different from our goal. That is the next step. We <br />need to invest some additional time and training to get there. We need to better link the <br />program budgeting with the KPIs. We are making good progress. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the KPIs are integral to program budgeting so we need <br />to embrace it and do it well. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if we think this much work is creating real productivity. She <br />asked how we are measuring success and how do we keep people from gaming the <br />system to look successful. She stated it is hard to measure quality using this system. <br />We can measure the number of streets plowed, etc, but doesn't tell you if there are <br />problems in that plowing. The quality of the work matters and right now she doesn't see <br />how we are measuring that. <br />Mayor Muckle stated it is hard to come up with good KPIs that give us the information <br />we want. He thinks we are pretty close to having KPIs we can use. We want some <br />consistency in the KPIs and we will need to improve them as we move forward. He <br />proposed all councilmembers submit recommendations for changes to staff and the <br />Finance Committee will review those to bring a new version back to Council. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated the KPIs are supposed to give us information on <br />quality; we can amend them to get more specific information. We need to look at them <br />closely to see if we are getting the information we want. These will be more useful when <br />employees embrace them. There is some work to be done, but some areas are top <br />notch. <br />Councilmember Keany feels some of the information is useful but it is a lot of data to <br />absorb. There needs to be more qualifying information to make them understandable. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated there is a qualitative measure in here but we need <br />more information from residents if we are meeting expectations. Part of that is to <br />complete a citizen survey more frequently. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.