Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 1, 2018 <br />Page 9 of 13 <br />Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote <br />Councilmember Keany moved to approve Resolution No. 24 with authorization for the <br />Mayor and City Manager to negotiate and approve potential revisions to the grant <br />contract to meet the direction from Council; Councilmember Maloney seconded. <br />Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — CITY PROGRAMS, GOALS AND KEY PERFORMANCE <br />INDICATORS <br />Assistant to the City Manager Hogan stated City Council adopted the City's first <br />program -based budget in which revenues and expenditures were organized by <br />programs and services in 2016. The budget was structured into 10 Program areas and <br />38 Sub -Programs to make it easier for the public to understand where the City invests <br />taxes and fees to provide services and for Council to evaluate how efficiently and <br />effectively the City uses those resources to achieve the objectives of each Sub- <br />Program. <br />She stated progress toward the objectives of each Sub -Program is measured by Key <br />Performance Indicators (KPIs). 38 KPIs were developed for the City's Sub -Programs. <br />Staff reviews the KPIs annually to determine if the goals and objectives accurately <br />represent staffs activities and if there are different KPIs that should be used to evaluate <br />progress in accomplishing those goals and objectives. The proposed changes have <br />been incorporated in the KPIs for Council's review. Reviewing the KPIs annually <br />ensures that the City is using measures that provide useful information in regards to <br />efficiency and effectiveness. <br />Staffis seeking feedback on these so they can begin collecting data for the upcoming <br />budget retreat in July. <br />Public Comments — None. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the KPIs evaluate the success of City programs and <br />subprograms and ideally serve three purposes: 1) as a performance tool to help us <br />continually improve, 2) as a management tool, and 3) most importantly as a <br />communication tool to inform our citizens how the city is investing tax dollars and <br />providing services. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated the Finance Committee discussed these but did not <br />change any of the proposed revisions to the KPIs. He stated the conceptual framework <br />is understood at varying levels in staff and in the Council. These should answer the <br />question how do we know if a program is successful. Some KPIs answer this better than <br />others. If we continue to use the KPIs we need to have Council and staff better <br />understand these. <br />