Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 1,2018 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />City Attorney Light explained his interpretation that at least one of the sites needs to be <br />in the existing Historic Preservation area to use Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) <br />money on the site research. Councilmember Stolzmann stated her interpretation that <br />the cabins came from the original historic preservation area so these expenditures are <br />acceptable. <br />Mayor Muckle moved to study two options: 1) both cabins at Miners Field and 2) one at <br />Miners Field and one at Highway 42. Councilmember Keany seconded. <br />Councilmember Leh stated some concerns for the Highway 42 site. Councilmember Loo <br />agreed. <br />Councilmember Loo stated she would like Hutchinson and/or Nawatny Greenway as <br />they may be cheaper for installation. <br />Vote: Motion passed 4-3 (Mayor Muckle, Mayor Pro Tem Lipton, Council Member <br />Stolzmann, Council Member Maloney voted yes.) <br />Councilmember Keany asked that if there is no savings in only doing two options would <br />Council like to consider adding a third site. Director Zuccaro stated staff will bring back <br />the item if there are no cost savings in only doing two. <br />South Boulder Road Connectivity Feasibility Study and Plan <br />Approval of Contract Between the City of Louisville and Fehr and Peers for the <br />South Boulder Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Feasibility Study and <br />Plan <br />Approval of Resolution No. 24, Series 2018 — A Resolution Approving a Grant <br />Agreement Between the City of Louisville and the State Board of the Great <br />Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund for Funding of the City of Louisville South Boulder <br />Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Feasibility Study and Plan <br />Moved from consent <br />Director Kowar stated this item is to hire a consultant to establish a baseline for the <br />South Boulder Road corridor for data around accidents, traffic volumes, safety, existing <br />facilities, and possible new facilities. Part of this would be funded by a grant from Great <br />Outdoors Colorado (GOCO). This is a discussion of the whole corridor and the <br />feasibility of improvements at various locations. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she asked this be removed to the regular agenda so <br />Council can narrow the focus of the study. She feels we already have public feedback <br />and know people want an underpass at South Boulder Road and Main Street and one <br />at South Boulder Road and Eisenhower Avenue. We know we want to these two <br />underpasses designed in this process and after that we can discuss funding and <br />priorities. The public needs to know we have heard them and are being responsive. <br />