My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 05 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 05 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 8:22:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 05 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 1,2018 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />City Attorney Light explained his interpretation that at least one of the sites needs to be <br />in the existing Historic Preservation area to use Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) <br />money on the site research. Councilmember Stolzmann stated her interpretation that <br />the cabins came from the original historic preservation area so these expenditures are <br />acceptable. <br />Mayor Muckle moved to study two options: 1) both cabins at Miners Field and 2) one at <br />Miners Field and one at Highway 42. Councilmember Keany seconded. <br />Councilmember Leh stated some concerns for the Highway 42 site. Councilmember Loo <br />agreed. <br />Councilmember Loo stated she would like Hutchinson and/or Nawatny Greenway as <br />they may be cheaper for installation. <br />Vote: Motion passed 4-3 (Mayor Muckle, Mayor Pro Tem Lipton, Council Member <br />Stolzmann, Council Member Maloney voted yes.) <br />Councilmember Keany asked that if there is no savings in only doing two options would <br />Council like to consider adding a third site. Director Zuccaro stated staff will bring back <br />the item if there are no cost savings in only doing two. <br />South Boulder Road Connectivity Feasibility Study and Plan <br />Approval of Contract Between the City of Louisville and Fehr and Peers for the <br />South Boulder Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Feasibility Study and <br />Plan <br />Approval of Resolution No. 24, Series 2018 — A Resolution Approving a Grant <br />Agreement Between the City of Louisville and the State Board of the Great <br />Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund for Funding of the City of Louisville South Boulder <br />Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Feasibility Study and Plan <br />Moved from consent <br />Director Kowar stated this item is to hire a consultant to establish a baseline for the <br />South Boulder Road corridor for data around accidents, traffic volumes, safety, existing <br />facilities, and possible new facilities. Part of this would be funded by a grant from Great <br />Outdoors Colorado (GOCO). This is a discussion of the whole corridor and the <br />feasibility of improvements at various locations. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she asked this be removed to the regular agenda so <br />Council can narrow the focus of the study. She feels we already have public feedback <br />and know people want an underpass at South Boulder Road and Main Street and one <br />at South Boulder Road and Eisenhower Avenue. We know we want to these two <br />underpasses designed in this process and after that we can discuss funding and <br />priorities. The public needs to know we have heard them and are being responsive. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.