Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 1, 2018 <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />Other improvements would be complementary, but they should not be ways to avoid <br />doing the underpasses. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked how this fits into the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) <br />which will have a long list of transportation needs. Director Kowar stated the TMP is a <br />high level viewpoint of city needs with many projects. This project will be very specific to <br />the needs of the South Boulder Road corridor and getting more information and more <br />certainty on pricing. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if we don't use the $75K from GOCO for this, could we use it <br />elsewhere. Deputy City, Manager Davis stated narrowing the focus may beeacceptable. <br />The grant application stated there would be three alternatives so if we reduced the <br />scope of work it might change the funding level. <br />Councilmember Leh stated people have spoken and they want an underpass. The <br />proposal talks a great bit about public engagement; but we may not need that on this <br />topic; we know what they want. <br />Councilmember Keany stated there may be options other than an underpass that are <br />financially feasible and we should not discount options that will make it safer to cross <br />South Boulder Road. He stated we may not need the public outreach. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated his expectation is cost estimates for underpasses and <br />other options not at -grade that may integrate into a longer term solution. Traffic will only <br />get worse on South Boulder Road. We committed to the community that we would get a <br />cost estimate on a tunnel and other options are also helpful. We should also look at bike <br />lanes on South Boulder Road. At a minimum we would like estimates on underpasses <br />at the two locations and any other options not at -grade. <br />Director Kowar stated staff will have to justify the costs of these improvements so some <br />public process will likely be needed to make sure we are on track. <br />Mayor Muckle supported focusing on getting outcomes we know our citizens want; <br />underpasses at Main Street and at Eisenhower. He noted the Main Street crossing <br />could be very expensive; we should study our options there. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann moved to give staff direction that two of the three designs be <br />underpasses at Eisenhower and Main. Councilmember Maloney seconded. All in favor. <br />Councilmember Keany asked if we find an overpass is significantly cheaper than an <br />underpass that the information be included. <br />Councilmember Keany moved to approve the contract with the amendments as directed <br />by Council; Councilmember Stolzmann seconded. <br />