My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 05 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 05 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 8:22:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 05 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 1, 2018 <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />Other improvements would be complementary, but they should not be ways to avoid <br />doing the underpasses. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked how this fits into the Transportation Master Plan (TMP) <br />which will have a long list of transportation needs. Director Kowar stated the TMP is a <br />high level viewpoint of city needs with many projects. This project will be very specific to <br />the needs of the South Boulder Road corridor and getting more information and more <br />certainty on pricing. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if we don't use the $75K from GOCO for this, could we use it <br />elsewhere. Deputy City, Manager Davis stated narrowing the focus may beeacceptable. <br />The grant application stated there would be three alternatives so if we reduced the <br />scope of work it might change the funding level. <br />Councilmember Leh stated people have spoken and they want an underpass. The <br />proposal talks a great bit about public engagement; but we may not need that on this <br />topic; we know what they want. <br />Councilmember Keany stated there may be options other than an underpass that are <br />financially feasible and we should not discount options that will make it safer to cross <br />South Boulder Road. He stated we may not need the public outreach. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated his expectation is cost estimates for underpasses and <br />other options not at -grade that may integrate into a longer term solution. Traffic will only <br />get worse on South Boulder Road. We committed to the community that we would get a <br />cost estimate on a tunnel and other options are also helpful. We should also look at bike <br />lanes on South Boulder Road. At a minimum we would like estimates on underpasses <br />at the two locations and any other options not at -grade. <br />Director Kowar stated staff will have to justify the costs of these improvements so some <br />public process will likely be needed to make sure we are on track. <br />Mayor Muckle supported focusing on getting outcomes we know our citizens want; <br />underpasses at Main Street and at Eisenhower. He noted the Main Street crossing <br />could be very expensive; we should study our options there. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann moved to give staff direction that two of the three designs be <br />underpasses at Eisenhower and Main. Councilmember Maloney seconded. All in favor. <br />Councilmember Keany asked if we find an overpass is significantly cheaper than an <br />underpass that the information be included. <br />Councilmember Keany moved to approve the contract with the amendments as directed <br />by Council; Councilmember Stolzmann seconded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.