My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 05 08
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 05 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 8:23:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 05 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Special Meeting Minutes <br />May 8, 2018 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION — <br />2018 CITIZEN SURVEY <br />Hogan stated that during the annual review of the City's Programs and Key <br />Performance Indicators (KPIs), staff suggested the Citizen Survey be conducted every <br />two years instead of four years to provide useful trend data. A number of effectiveness <br />measures in the KPIs use the results of the Citizen Survey to determine how well a <br />program is meeting its goals and addressing the needs of residents <br />Staff suggests a 2018 Citizen Survey focus on resident satisfaction with the City's <br />programs and services as listed in the effectiveness measures of the KPIs, as well as <br />several policy issues (for example, Historical Museum Visitor Center, transportation, <br />trash service for HOAs and commercial properties). The survey can be mailed by June <br />or July and staff can have the results by September or October. The results can provide. <br />additional information for Council to use during the 2019/2020 budget process. <br />Staff recommends City Council direct staff to begin the process for the 2018 Citizen <br />Survey. Staff also requests Council appoint two liaisons to work with staff in the <br />development of the survey. <br />Mayor Muckle stated a two-year cycle makes sense to help with the KPIs and resident <br />satisfaction. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated there are probably policy questions that should be <br />surveyed more regularly. She stated for the performance indicators she would take a <br />different approach of asking our Boards and Commissions to weigh in on an annual <br />basis on the relevant KPI topics. <br />Councilmember Maloney suggested using a four—year cycle for general questions and <br />policy questions on an alternating four-year cycle without mixing them. He noted using <br />the general survey for the KPIs may be asking people about programs they don't use. <br />Councilmember Leh stated policy questions are important and should be asked every <br />two years. Those issues get lost in the general survey and we need those answers <br />more often. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he was not sure the boards are the best way to get input for some <br />questions; their views may not be consistent with the public at large. He likes the idea of <br />using the boards on the KPIs but there may be some on which we want citizen input. <br />We probably need to expect some policy questions on the general survey every four <br />years to get the answers we need in those budget years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.