My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/20/2018 9:23:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 07 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 3, 2018 <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION/ACTION — FISCAL IMPACT MODEL REVIEW <br />Director Zuccaro stated staff is presenting an overview of the City's Fiscal Impact <br />Models and seeking policy guidance on the model inputs and when to utilize the Fiscal <br />Models in development review. This is on the work plan for 2018. The Finance <br />Committee has reviewed this. <br />Two Fiscal Model Types <br />Originally Developed in 2014 — Move from Direct Cost to Marginal Cost Models and <br />includes a Development Impact Model — Marginal/Average Cost Hybrid for Individual <br />Development Proposals and an Area Planning Model — Marginal Cost Model for City - <br />Wide or Area Land Use Scenarios. <br />The current model was developed in 2014 and we are moving from a direct cost model <br />to a marginal cost model. This will be a better fit for a community like Louisville which is <br />closer to build out. We have been using this as tool on new developments since 2014. <br />Since 2014 there have been some modifications to the model including adding <br />office/worker spending into the model. There were some oddities in the model and it <br />needed to be aligned with the program based budgeting. This is reflected in the newly <br />refreshed model. <br />The Fiscal Model can help ensure new developments have sustainable funding for City <br />capital and services and evaluate fiscal impact of different land use scenarios and <br />changes. Fiscal Models do not evaluate social impacts, environmental impacts, <br />community character or market probability. It is important to relate this to the actual <br />criteria by which a development is to be judged. <br />The model does show the effect on various city funds over a 20-year period. When staff <br />works with the model some assumptions are made including the value of the building, <br />income assumptions, vehicle miles, and more. That is used to determine how much the <br />city will have to pay to provide services. Assumptions are from standardized sources as <br />much as possible. Working with the Finance Committee, staff has created a list of direct <br />inputs and their sources. Staff proposed a standard way to show a range of scenarios <br />so they can have a high and low scenario to bring to Council when considering a <br />development. <br />Director Zuccaro wanted to make sure Council is comfortable with how staff is running <br />the model, bringing a range of possible outcomes and would like to know when to use <br />which model. He presented a suggested table noting the intent to use this when it adds <br />value to the development review. He noted Council has been asking for a range for the <br />Fiscal Model. He proposed a way to do that by taking 80% of the developer <br />provided/anticipated values and then double the absorption rates. <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.