My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 07 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:28 PM
Creation date
7/20/2018 9:23:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7D3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 07 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 3, 2018 <br />Page 7 of 11 <br />Director Zuccaro asked for Council feedback on this broad directional model and <br />clarification on when and what model should be run. The Marginal Average Hybrid <br />Model is usually done with smaller developments. The Marginal Cost Model has been <br />used for area planning, general development plans and broader planning efforts. The <br />intent is to use this when it adds value to the criteria being considered; is the City able <br />to continue to provide adequate services to the community. He presented a draft table <br />showing which model would be used according to the application type. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if developers know we are reducing their suggested value <br />by 80% won't developers game the system. Director Zuccaro stated staff would not <br />blindly move forward if the numbers seem out of context. Scenarios could be run to true <br />it up <br />Public Comments — None. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated this really is a directional model to help with policy <br />decisions. He noted the importance of when the model is used and the model <br />assumptions. This is the product of work with the Finance Committee and many of the <br />numbers were changed from the original model to be more accurate. He was very <br />comfortable moving forward with this and felt this is much more accurate than the old <br />model. <br />Mayor Muckle supported the staff recommendation for use. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if the chart could be clearer when there is no need to include <br />a fiscal model. Councilmember Leh asked if the policy statement made that clear. <br />Mayor Muckle noted staff could take a look and see if there was a need to adjust the <br />table for clarity on that issue. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION/ACTION — CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN <br />COLORADO COMMUNITIES FOR CLIMATE ACTION <br />Mayor Muckle stated he is asking for Council's consideration of joining the Colorado <br />Communities for Climate Action (CC4CA), a statewide coalition representing local <br />governments (5 counties and 9 municipalities) in advancing state and federal actions to <br />reduce climate -changing emissions. CC4CA works to bring the local government <br />perspective into discussions around new climate actions, and to prevent the roll -back of <br />important climate protections that impact local communities. <br />Mayor Muckle stated their policy agenda is very much in alignment with our policy <br />agenda and with our sustainability goals. The primary purpose is to lobby federal and <br />state on local issues and not impede local efforts on climate action. This is another way <br />for us to successfully collaborate with other entities on a variety of issues. <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.