Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 7, 2018 <br />Page 13 of 17 <br />2. Are current fees aligned with costs <br />3. How do we compare to other jurisdictions <br />4. Considerations for adjusting fees in the future <br />The review of the costs included personnel, consultants, vehicles, facilities, operations, <br />insurance, and software. We reviewed how fees are collected and the fee table and <br />compared costs to other jurisdictions. <br />Building Permit Fee Review <br />Findings and Recommendations: <br />• Current fees aligned with costs: <br />• Fees within range of other regional jurisdictions <br />• No immediate adjustments to fees recommended — consider inflationary <br />adjustments <br />• New technology should improve customer service and efficiency, but could <br />increase costs <br />Councilmember Loo stated it was good to know our costs are right in the ballpark with <br />everyone else. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked Finance Director Watson if he had reviewed and had <br />confidence in the numbers. Director Watson stated he did review the methodology and <br />it did appear reasonable. <br />Councilmember Maloney stated we need to be covering our costs and that is our <br />fiduciary duty. He asked if building fee incentives on a BAP (Business Assistance <br />Package) are collected and refunded. Director Watson stated we book the gross <br />revenue and have offsetting accounts for the BAP payment revenue so we can look at <br />both the gross and the net amounts. Councilmember Maloney stated we are reducing <br />revenue to cover the costs of building fees with BAPs and philosophically he has an <br />issue with that. There should be a funding source identified, likely the General Fund, <br />that is not reducing building revenues. Mayor Muckle agreed and said the scale of the <br />effect on building revenues is also useful information. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann agreed revenue for BAPs should be accounted for <br />somehow without charging other permit pullers. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton agreed BAPs need to be accounted for another way. He would <br />like more analysis of the BAPs and their impact on the fees, perhaps this is the wrong <br />source of revenue for this. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann suggested the Finance Committee address the BAP <br />questions before fees are set this year. City Manager Balser will bring that back for <br />specific direction. <br />