Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 9, 2018 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />Zuccaro stated that there was public notice and that the waiver requirements were <br />codified in a staff condition. He did not think staff could bring more information to the <br />Commission that would help them make the decision on the waiver. <br />Hoefner asked if the Commission could approve a request that had not been asked for. <br />Zuccaro stated that they could recommend approval of the waiver to City Council based <br />on the waiver criteria while noting that the application still required a waiver request. <br />Brauneis stated that he was in favor of the motion with the conditions and with the <br />request that staff err on the side of remanding the application back to the Commission <br />with any significant changes. <br />Zuccaro read his proposals for the applicant's conditions and stated that they should be <br />met before the Council hearing: <br />(1) Staff recommends no change to this condition. <br />(2) Staff recommends removal of this condition. <br />(3) Replace current condition with "provide typical parking and drive -aisle <br />dimensions that demonstrate compliance with adopted city standards." <br />(4) Add a note to the PUD plans that the trash enclosure is designed to meet <br />CDDSG standards and guidelines to be verified by city staff at the time of <br />building permit review. <br />(5) Add a note to the PUD plans that the final sod and seed mix and the location of <br />mulch will be reviewed with the submittal of the building permit and Public Works <br />construction documents and shall comply with adopted city standards. <br />(6) Add a note to the PUD plans stating that all ADA requirements must be met and <br />verified at the time of the building permit review. <br />Zuccaro stated that he was willing to get rid of number 6 as well, since it <br />will be verified anyway. In general, staff likes to see this ahead of time but <br />considering the circumstances staff is willing to omit this condition. <br />(7) Applicant will work with Excel to verify the final location and width of all easement <br />requirements and revise the subdivision plat as needed. <br />Hsu requested the addition of a waiver request before going ahead to Council. <br />Hoefner suggested that Rob read everything back clean including Hsu's waiver <br />amendment. Zuccaro read the amendments and conditions to be included in the <br />Commission's motions. <br />Zuccaro proposed that the Commission's resolution recommending approval to City <br />Council shall be amended as follows in reference to the document supplied by the <br />applicant titled, "Items in Resolution No 11 Series 2018 that I have issues with." The <br />referring document has the original condition numbers listed on it, here replaced with <br />items number one through seven. Amendments based on that document are as follows: <br />(1) Staff recommends no change to this condition. <br />(2) Staff recommends removal of this condition. <br />(3) Replace current condition with "provide typical parking and drive -aisle <br />dimensions that demonstrate compliance with adopted city standards." <br />