Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 4, 2018 <br />Page 4 of 14 <br />request their dedications be deferred. If agreed by Council, those fees would need to be <br />paid when developed and be paid based on appraised values at that time. Ascent would <br />owe $173,079 now. Dean noted without this plat the Outlots would not be dedicated to <br />the City for future trail use. Staff also feels this development of the property may serve <br />to catalyze additional development. <br />Staff views the request as a subdivision modification request. Staff finds the application <br />meets the modification request requirements: it does not alter the essential character of <br />the neighborhood, it still meets the purposes set forth in the zoning code; there are no <br />other design alternatives, and there is no additional land we would like dedicated <br />through this process. Dean noted the options now are to require the full dedication fee, <br />accept the deferment request, or require an alternate means to satisfy the requirement. <br />Dean reviewed the options for trail design. Planning Commission and Open Space <br />Advisory Board prefer option B which elevates the trail. <br />Staff finds the PUD meets all requirements of the CDDSG and landscape design <br />standards. Dean reviewed the architecture. She noted the fiscal model shows there is a <br />$910,000 negative fiscal impact annually, but when the high and low scenarios are <br />factored in with possible commercial development on the property we could see positive <br />fiscal impacts with the development of the three properties. <br />Staff recommends approval. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked about the private roads, he is concerned about allowing <br />private roads given previous issues with maintenance on private roads. He asked what <br />tools we have to enforce maintenance. Attorney Light stated we typically put in <br />subdivision requirements that the owner or successor is required to maintain the roads. <br />It makes sure there is a funding mechanism in place to pay for maintenance. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked if those same mechanisms are in place in other areas. <br />Attorney Light stated no they were not included at that time. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton <br />wants to make sure we have a mechanism where the City can require maintenance. <br />Attorney Light stated additional language can be attached establishing the performance <br />standards for maintenance. Mayor Pro Tem Lipton stated he likes an option so the City <br />has the ability to enforce the maintenance. Dean stated the applicant is aware we are <br />looking to include an elevated level in the maintenance agreement and it will be <br />enforceable. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked if there is a landscaping requirement for phase 1 Dean, <br />stated yes there is a plan to implement landscaping with the church and any later <br />commercial development will alsobe required to meet landscaping requirements and <br />with the first development of either commercial property the sidewalk along 96th Street <br />will be installed. <br />