My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 09 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2018 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2018 09 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:29 PM
Creation date
9/21/2018 10:04:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
8D6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2018 09 17
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
596
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 28, 2018 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />He noted tonight is to get input on community engagement, the market study has <br />already begun and stakeholder involvement will begin in the next few weeks. In <br />October they will come back with initial findings and present a final report at a third <br />session in December. <br />Mr. Guimond asked Council to address two questions: What outcomes do you hope this <br />will achieve? How do you define success in this process? <br />Councilmember Maloney asked how to reach alignment on market analysis and public <br />input when potential uses aren't allowed. Mr. Guimond said he knows about the <br />regulatory constraints and how it seems to be why nothing has happened. The intent is <br />to work closely with staff to evaluate the regulatory constraints and see if there are other <br />ways to address those. <br />Councilmember Loo asked how to get input from those who don't come to meetings, <br />those that aren't usually vocal. There is a need for input from all different kinds of <br />personalities. This is a very complex piece of property that people don't understand. It is <br />hard to explain covenants and have it understood that the City is not the owner. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann noted some market areas attract shopping from people that <br />are not just the residents. Mr. Guimond said they review the market sections in detail <br />including residents and employees and also understanding the competitive boundaries. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked about property owner engagement. Ms. Powell noted <br />it is a huge piece and will require a big education piece for how we got here. The plan is <br />to interview people individually without city staff, and ask neutral questions to get frank <br />discussion. Major owners will be interviewed directly and privately. Further out perhaps <br />nearby HOAs or owners' associations will be contacted. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked how it will be addressed if a property owner's vision <br />does not align with the market or public vision. Mr. Guimond noted this is a possibility, <br />generally there is some interest in development, or selling; we will need to flush out their <br />objectives. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if new residences in Superior are being considered as part <br />of this market. Mr. Guimond stated yes, from a market perspective it is part of this area. <br />Council was asked what outcomes they hope to achieve from the study. <br />Mayor Muckle hopes the study will help the site and adjacent sites redevelop in a way <br />good for our finances; that our residents like the area, and it has significant public <br />benefit (park). He would like a gathering place and the area to be a benefit to that part <br />of town. He wants something other than a standard retail plan, he wants a vision of what <br />34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.