My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 09 11 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 09 11 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
10/3/2018 9:48:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 09 11 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 11, 2018 <br />Page 11 of 13 <br />point that can suggest other ways of getting more in depth information. These questions <br />will get good information that can lead Council to look for more information and input. <br />Councilmember Loo stated #3 should give an option for "I don't care". Question #5 <br />people might mark everything essential and some are opposing views. The whole <br />question is about multi -modal, and the car question is buried. She is worried the <br />questions give residents expectations for projects we cannot fulfill. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated now Council has seen the big picture, perhaps there <br />is a better process to use to get this information such as public hearings or outreach. <br />We need to prioritize and focus. Each topic is important to someone and we don't have <br />the bandwidth to take on everything so we need to determine what we can take on and <br />some public opportunities to see where people are on those topics. Think about our <br />priorities and scope and use the public process for those. <br />Councilmember Leh noted the reason we do surveys at all is to find out what the public <br />thinks and we are not entirely comfortable with our own sense of what is going on in the <br />community and public opinion. Council gets information from the public in a lot of ways, <br />and we do it in good faith, but still some information is useful and we can only get from a <br />survey. He wants to make sure we don't throw something out that is useful because we <br />are frustrated with the whole. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton said we seem to be in serious disagreement about the project <br />and didn't think we should try to salvage it tonight. <br />Councilmember Maloney still thought a policy survey could inform us, but this is not a <br />concise policy survey but an amalgamation of all of our ideas. Transportation questions <br />can be asked during the Transportation Master Plan and Sam's from the market study. <br />Broadband is too early. There are some easy ways to get this information in other ways <br />and we can do another way. <br />Mayor Muckle couldn't justify spending more money and staff time on this right now. <br />Councilmember Loo asked if another Committee should be appointed to take another <br />look at this. <br />City Manager Balser stated staff needs clear consensus from the entire Council and <br />asked if this is a priority for everyone to work on. Everyone in the room needs to do this <br />and needs to determine if this is a priority for Council's time and resources right now. <br />Mayor Muckle was not sure there would be a better result if forwarded to another <br />Committee. None of the questions were meant to be political, just trying to see if these <br />issues are important to the community and answer some questions. It is clear from the <br />conversation the broadband question is too early in the process. The difference from <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.