My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1998
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1996-1999 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
1998 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:01:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2018 10:26:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAMIN 1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Motion made and seconded. Motion approved by unammous voice vote <br /> 5 Insurance Services Office -Evaluating Building Code Effectiveness. <br /> Tom Talboom-This is a program which has come out of the Insurance Services Office which is <br /> very akin to the ISO grading program which has been in place for many years to evaluate fire <br /> service response and suppression efforts. It came from damage which occurred on the East Coast <br /> from the hurricanes. What they were finding is that many of the buildings were not built to the <br /> codes which the Communities had adopted. I has passed around some information with regard to <br /> the program. There is a class that will be offered at the Education Conference. I would be more <br /> than happy to get copies of any information for the Board. This program has been in place for <br /> several years. They started evaluation in high wind areas,the coastal regions. Then they went <br /> into the seismic areas,then proceeded to the less hazardous prone areas. This is the fourth year <br /> of the evaluation, in which Colorado is scheduled to be done They should cover the major part <br /> of the Denver Metro area the first part of this year They evaluate everything from most recent <br /> codes being adopted,to the qualification of inspections and Building Official. Administrative <br /> procedures, includmg Board of Appeals. I am not sure if they will request to interview the <br /> Chairman, or any of the Board members. Based on your score they will then grade you on a <br /> scale of one to ten. One being the lowest and Ten being the best. A lot of the communities have <br /> been graded from the Four to Six range. This rating can effect the rates of insurance for your <br /> community Mainly this is for hazardous areas. Flood zone, seismic zone, and high wind zones. <br /> I am not sure how this will effect the Louisville area. I feel it is worth going through the process <br /> and getting graded. <br /> Member Culhson- So most of the front range is getting graded? <br /> Tom Talboom-Arvada has already been graded, along with one of the other Denver Metro <br /> areas. <br /> Chairman Schurman-I would think this would also give you a good idea as to the qualification <br /> skill of your people in relation to other Municipalities. <br /> Member Culhson-Do they send a packet or do they do an actual interview? <br /> Tom Talboom-They send a packet and then follow up with interviews of City Staff, as well as <br /> contractors and businesses. <br /> Sam Light-Do they provide any information on the typical amount of rate reduction that may be <br /> recognized. <br /> Tom Talboom-I think there are some examples in the questionnaire booklet. I don't know if <br /> that is for a real hazardous prone area or any area in general. I would think that an area like ours <br /> would not recognize a real substantial rate reduction. This rating only applies to new building, or <br /> construction, which is done after your rating is in effect. Tam not sure how that would effect an <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.