My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1997 12 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1997 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1997 12 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:43 PM
Creation date
4/5/2004 1:44:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/16/1997
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1997 12 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
provide diverse housing facilities to residents of Louisville. Regarding the setback variance, the <br />applicant felt setbacks are established to limit the massing of buildings and prevent encroachment onto <br />rights-of-way or adjacent properties. They felt they had been successful in meeting this by keeping <br />the scale of the project low in terms of ground cover, the percentage of open space to floor space, <br />and limiting the facility to a single-story building. <br /> <br />Sisk inquired if the land purchase for this facility has been completed. <br /> <br />Taft responded that the land has not been purchased. <br /> <br />Sisk questioned whether any mortgagee of the second lot would be required to sign off on the <br />property in order for the City to maintain position as a third-party beneficiary to the easement <br />agreement. <br /> <br />Sam Light, City Attorney, responded the current easement agreement did require the mortgagee to <br />sign off on the property. <br /> <br />Sisk requested this issue be resolved before proceeding. <br /> <br />Dick Taft agreed to have the easement agreement in place prior to mortgaging the property. <br /> <br />Sisk questioned whether the letter received by Paul Wood from Don Orr was sufficient to satisfy <br />condition No. 1. <br /> <br />Sisk and Howard requested a formal agreement with the BVSD be in place prior to issuing a <br />certificate of occupancy. <br /> <br />Taft agreed and stated it would be prior to recording the PUD. <br /> <br />Howard raised concerns that Council approval for the setback variances would set a precedent for <br />future applicants requesting variances for similar reasons. The fence height variance was offset by the <br />substantial landscaping proposed. Howard questioned the roofing requirement variance. Dick Taft <br />explained the noise created from rain and hail on a metal roof becomes an issue when caring for <br />Alzheimer's patients as they are significantly impacted by unrecognizable/unidentifiable noises. <br />Howard felt this was reasonable, but also expressed concern for the parking and setback variances. <br /> <br />Levihn questioned the wording in the proposed parking agreement faxed to Don Orr on September <br />25, 1997. The last paragraph of that agreement allowed them to cancel at any time with a 30-day <br />notice. <br /> <br />Taft agreed to contact Don and request eliminating that statement. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.