My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1109 Spruce St History
PORTAL
>
HISTORICAL RECORDS (50.000)
>
ADDRESS HISTORIES
>
Spruce St Address Histories
>
1109 Spruce St History
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2021 2:09:15 PM
Creation date
11/15/2018 3:21:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Doc Type
Historical Records
Subdivision Name
East Louisville
Property Address Number
1109
Property Address Street Name
Spruce
Quality Check
11/15/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Steinbaugh Ownership, 1909-1921; Discussion of Date of Construction <br />By a deed recorded in 1909, Antonio Onorato sold Lots 6 & 7 to Elizabeth Steinbaugh. <br />She and her husband, Louisville businessman J.J. Steinbaugh, lived elsewhere with their <br />family, so this may have been rental property for her. It appears to have been during her <br />ownership that the house was constructed. <br />The following excerpt from the 1909 Drumm's Wall Map of Louisville shows the East <br />Louisville subdivision and the area of Lots 6 & 7 of Block 3, which is the current location <br />of 1109 Spruce. This map shows a house straddling Lots 5 & 6. The reason for this is not <br />known, and it could have been an error. The County property records do not indicate <br />that there was common ownership between Lots 5 & 6. <br />The County gives 1915 as the date of construction of 1109 Spruce. Boulder County has <br />sometimes been found to be in error with respect to construction dates of Louisville <br />buildings, so other evidence is looked to. If the map shows an error and the building <br />should have appeared on Lots 6 and 7 on the 1909 map, then that would suggest an <br />earlier construction date than 1915. However, in the absence of strong evidence to the <br />contrary, the plausible date of "circa 1915" is the estimated date. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.