Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Staff Report <br />December 13, 2018 <br />(building). The following table provides as summary of how jurisdictions address odor <br />regulation, with specific code language included in endnotes of this report. <br />Odor Regulations by City <br />City <br />How does the city regulate odor? <br />Fort Collins <br />Property -related odor violations. More explicit than other codes in restricting "vapors, <br />gas, odors, smoke, dust, heat, or glare".' <br />Breckenridge <br />Application requires plan for ventilation system. Property related odor violations." <br />Denver <br />Regulates marijuana odor through the Air Pollution Control section of its code. The <br />Department of Environmental Health investigates odor complaints, using a device <br />that measures the intensity of an odor, or when five or more residents call in a <br />complaint in a 12-hour period. "' <br />Aurora <br />Application requires plan for ventilation system. Property -related odor violations."' <br />Boulder <br />Application requires plan for ventilation system. v Property -related odor violations."' <br />Applicants have to consult an industrial hygienist."" Section of code specifically for <br />marijuana odor emissions. viii <br />Lafayette <br />Application requires plan for ventilation system. Property -related odor violations.ix <br />Exact code language for each regulation given in endnotes. <br />Staff contacted the Fire District to see if they have any concerns about cultivation <br />operations. The District stated that as long as such operations meet all of the current <br />building and fire codes they would not have any specific concerns. It would require <br />some additional work from Fire staff as annual inspections are required, but that can be <br />done by current staff. The District noted this specific business can cause different kinds <br />of hazards, but as long as they are aware of the hazard and the location, the Fire <br />District is comfortable with this use. <br />If the City does desire to allow cultivation, staff recommends that the City consider <br />adopting an excise tax on cultivation. The City could request approval from the voters <br />of an excise tax up to 5% on the first sale or transfer from a retail marijuana cultivation <br />facility. Other cities and counties have used excise tax to help offset the cost of <br />enforcement and monitoring of marijuana business and for drug education and <br />prevention programs addressing under aged consumption of marijuana. The excise tax <br />could also be placed in the City's general fund without restriction. <br />Some communities, including Boulder and Lafayette, have a size limitation on <br />cultivation facilities. Boulder limits the size to 15,000 sq. ft. and Lafayette limits the size <br />to 20,000 sq. ft. Under the proposed ordinance there is no limitation on size of facilities. <br />If the Planning Commission recommends allowing cultivation in the I zone, the <br />Commission may want to consider also recommend limiting the area allowed for each <br />facility or overall for the City. A limited area could help address any possible negative <br />impacts from cultivation an help to ensure the City can maintain reasonable oversite of <br />cultivation facilities. <br />Staff also contacted several other local jurisdictions that allow cultivation. The findings <br />comments from these communities is summarized in the following table: <br />Marijuana Code Amendments Page 8 of 12 <br />PC — December 13, 2018 <br />27 <br />