My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 01 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LEGAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 01 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:20:39 PM
Creation date
1/16/2019 2:48:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LCPKT 2019 01 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Municipal Judge Biennial Evaluation <br />1. Members of the Legal Review Committee will visit and observe Court at least <br />once and complete an evaluation form. Evaluation forms will be anonymous <br />and kept confidential through the process, however the final rating is public <br />record. <br />Possible questions. <br />1. Courtroom management: The Judge maintains appropriate courtroom <br />control and makes adequate rulings based on the law. <br />2. Knowledge: The Judge takes time to consider relevant facts and based <br />decisions on those facts and statements presented <br />3. Communication: The Judge makes sure participants understand what is <br />going on in the courtroom <br />4. Demeanor: Parties are treated with dignity and respect and the Judge was <br />able to maintain a neutral attitude during court proceedings <br />5. Diligence: Cases are processed in an efficient manner and the Judge was <br />prepared for each case on the docket <br />6. Parties are given the opportunity to speak and be heard, and were treated <br />with respect. <br />7. The Judge displays a sense of basic fairness and justice. <br />8. The Judge treats all parties equally regardless of race, sex, age, ethnicity, <br />social status, or economic status. <br />II. Court staff and Prosecuting Attorney will complete an evaluation form. <br />Evaluation forms will be anonymous and kept confidential through the <br />process, however the final rating is public record. <br />Possible questions. <br />1. Courtroom management: The Judge maintains appropriate courtroom control <br />and made adequate rulings based on the law. <br />2. Knowledge: The Judge takes time to consider relevant facts and based <br />decisions on those facts and statements presented <br />3. Communication: The Judge makes sure participants understand what is going <br />on in the courtroom <br />4. Demeanor: Parties are treated with dignity and respect and the Judge was <br />able to maintain a neutral attitude during court proceedings <br />5. Diligence: Cases are processed in an efficient manner and the Judge was <br />prepared for each case on their docket <br />6. Parties are given the opportunity to speak and be heard, and were treated <br />with respect. <br />7. The Judge shows consistency in Court proceedings. <br />8. The Judge communicates well with the prosecutor and court staff regarding <br />court management. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).