My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 03 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2019 03 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:30 PM
Creation date
3/1/2019 2:04:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
9A1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2019 03 05
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 12, 2019 <br />Page 12 of 12 <br />exploratory discussions would be worthwhile. He noted staff time is limited and we have <br />many important things that would take priority over this, but should at least explore a little. <br />Mayor Muckle stated he is intrigued by the idea of collaboration but need to know what <br />the problem is we are trying to solve. He is not willing to give up branding or control and <br />the ability to offer programs to people of all backgrounds and socio-economic levels. This <br />is not enough as presented; want to see more investment in Louisville possibly in other <br />locations and perhaps with other options for an underpass and access issues to be <br />addressed. Just more fields is not enough but there is potential. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated she does hear from residents they want more multi- <br />purpose fields. We should talk to Lafayette to see if this is something they can manage on <br />their own and can come to us if they need our help. We need to know community needs <br />for field time. We didn't get any feedback from the soccer teams on this so we don't know <br />if they are supportive of this. We should get some public feedback on the proposal. <br />Councilmember Loo agreed with Mayor Pro Tem Lipton that we need to determine our <br />own needs. <br />Councilmember Keany stated he was concerned about loss of control of our fields and <br />facilities and the possible lost revenue. He would recommend getting more information <br />but be cautious. We want to make sure the site is properly parked without using our area. <br />City Manager Balser summarized that there is some interest but this is not on the top of <br />the City's priority list so analysis may be slow. Lafayette has some of the same concerns. <br />Staff will continue to have conversations and get more details but it will probably be a few <br />months out. <br />Mayor Muckle noted we agree with the principles but know Lafayette can do what they <br />want to do so it would be beneficial to stay engaged to some degree. <br />ADVANCED AGENDA & IDENTIFICATION OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS <br />Members reviewed the advanced agenda. <br />ADJOURN <br />Members adjourned at 9:38 pm. <br />Robert P. Muckle, Mayor <br />Meredyth Muth, City Clerk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.