My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 03 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
LEGAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
>
2006-2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Legal Review Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Legal Review Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 03 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:20:39 PM
Creation date
3/18/2019 10:20:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
LCPKT 2019 03 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Biennial Evaluation <br />1. Members of the City Council will each complete an evaluation form. Evaluation <br />forms will be anonymous and kept confidential through the process, however the <br />final rating is public record. <br />Possible questions. <br />1. Does the City Council feel it is getting value for its legal fees? <br />1. Does the City Attorney provide information and advice to Council which <br />facilitates the de i-sion_making process? <br />2. Has the legal advice provided by the City Attorncy proven to be accuratc <br />and technically correct? <br />3:2. Does the City Attorney provide honest recommendations given all <br />legal issues and ramifications? <br />4.3. Does the City Attorney possess an efficient and effective <br />knowledge of the Municipal Code and City Charter? <br />5:4. Does the City Attorney possess an efficient and effective <br />knowledge of government regulations and case law regarding issues <br />facing the City? <br />61:149es the City Attorney regularly provide the scope of legal expertise <br />necessary to meet the City's needs either from herself or within her firm? <br />Does the City Attorney proactively identify potential issues to avoid <br />future problems? <br />8. Is the City Attorncy able to maintain the City Council's and staff': <br />confidence while informing them of the different legal risks that -proposed <br />actions might generate? <br />9,6. Is the City Attorney's approach effective in achieving the best <br />possible legal outcomes for the City? <br />10.7. Does the City Attorney represent the City in a professional and <br />ethical manner? <br />Is the City Attorney impartial and objective in her duties and <br />responsibilities? <br />12 Does the City ttorney acc irately interpret and clarify City Council and <br />City Manager direction? <br />13.9. Does the City Attorney communicate effectively with the City <br />Council and staff? <br />14. Does the City Attorney maintain confidentiality regarding all matters <br />discussed with the Council? <br />15.10. Are the City Attorney's communications complete and <br />understandable, and do they answer Council's questions? <br />16.11. Does the City Attorney maintain effective and open <br />communications with the City Council? <br />17. Does the City Attorney recognize and respect the Council's role in City <br />with Council policy. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.