My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 03 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2006-2019 Water Committee Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Utility Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2019 03 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:46:11 AM
Creation date
3/18/2019 11:37:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
UCPKT 2019 03 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Utility Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Friday, January 18, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann asked when the North End Subdivision would join City <br />trash service. Mr. Kowar stated they are scheduled to start February 1st <br />Councilmember Stolzmann mentioned there is a planned presentation for <br />composting and asked if other Committee members would like to join her. Mayor <br />Muckle volunteered to join the presentation. Mayor Muckle asked about adding a <br />future discussion items about a regulation that would require the hauler to provide <br />service and price structure in a certain way. The Committee agreed to add this as <br />an agenda later in the year. The Committee also discussed moving the November <br />8tt' meeting before the election. It was decided to wait to see what topics are to be <br />discussed prior to moving the meeting. <br />VIII. CWCB Grant <br />Mr. Kowar explained that in the next 4 to 5 years the City will be looking to replace <br />the majority of the water meters at an estimated cost of approximately $2.3 million. <br />In perpetration of the meter replacement staff have begun exploring different meter <br />technologies including "smart" systems. One technology explored is a partnership <br />wth Dropcountr and Rachio. The Dropcountr is a real time integration technology <br />that would allow customers to see instant usage feedback through a website or <br />phone application. Rachio has partnered with the City since 2016 to provide smart <br />outdoor irrigation controllers as part of the conservation program. A five year pilot <br />program was developed between the City and these two entities to offer <br />Dropcountr to all customers. This pilot program was successful in obtaining a <br />CWCB grant for $158,000 to assist with funding. The City's cash contribution is <br />summarized as $115,350 over 5 years or approximately $25,000 per year. <br />The second program discussed is in connection to our existing meter provider, <br />Badger. Badger offers their own "smart" technology that could be integrated with <br />the existing meters with some retrofits. Mrs. Balser asked that the funding for both <br />programs be clarified. The Dropcountr/Rachio program would have a total cost of <br />$316,500. This cost includes $158,000 in grant funds, $42,900 in in -kind matching <br />funds and $115,350 in cash all over 5 years. The Badger program has a projected <br />cost of $44,000. Councilmember Stolzmann was in favor of both pilot program and <br />is hopefully the program can target different parts of town. Mr. Kowar agreed that <br />this was the intent of both programs. The Committee made and approved a motion <br />for Staff to bring both programs forward for Council approval. <br />IX. Update — Water Resources <br />• Water Supply Update — Mr. Peterson highlighted the current water supply <br />conditions as average and no action was needed at this time. Next, Mr. <br />Peterson gave an overview for the Reclaim Water System and explained <br />the cost comparisons included within the presentation. The Committee <br />discussed the components of the rate and which ones are appropriate in <br />determining a final rate. Mr. Peterson went on to explain the difficulties in <br />determining reclaim rates and the purpose of the presentation was to <br />provide a range based on what was included in the cost of the reclaim <br />water. As with other communities, the wide range of possible rates pushes <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.