My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 03 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 03 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:58 PM
Creation date
3/20/2019 2:54:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2019 03 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 5, 2019 <br />Page 11 of 13 <br />trails regional connection at 104th Street. At the last minute, cost updates on the <br />underpass came in showing a large increase As such, staff also submitted a project for <br />South Boulder Road at -grade safety and intersection improvements. She asked Council if <br />all four applications should still be in the process or any removed from consideration <br />There is $15 3M available for all of Boulder County There are 23 applications totaling <br />$40M in requests. <br />Staff would like to get direction on the two South Boulder Road proposals and if Council <br />would want to keep both in If both are kept in and the underpass is funded it would <br />reduce the at -grade improvements that would be completed Staff would also like to know <br />where the projects fall in prioritization for Council <br />Mayor Muckle asked where the regional funding was allocated Deputy City Manager <br />Davis noted that was already allocated for a Hwy 119 project and State Hwy 7 <br />Councilmember Stolzmann, serving as Louisville's DRCOG representative, added this <br />new process recognizes regional impact. She is looking know if Council wants to continue <br />with the underpass at this price so she can argue what Council wants. That project is <br />similar in scope to a project funded last year in Boulder The City would need to be ready <br />to put up the match if chosen There are a lot of good projects proposed for the region <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated a wait list will be created if new funding becomes <br />available which should be considered <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked what the plan for an at -grade crossing project would be at <br />South Boulder Road It would help to understand if the at -grade project alleviates other <br />concerns He stated he is concerned with the cost of the underpass, it would take all the <br />transportation money we have for all of our other projects. He is concerned the at -grade <br />improvements add to congestion and travel time <br />Councilmember Maloney stated he prefers the at -grade solution, it addresses more <br />intersections on South Boulder Road for safety For the future list, he would like a way to <br />connect all the way from Hwy 36 to Lafayette on a path Deputy City Manager Davis <br />stated that will happen with the next step of the Transportation Master Plan <br />Councilmember Keany stated he agreed with Councilmember Maloney for the at -grade <br />option The underpass would be great at some point, but now it makes more sense to <br />address multiple intersections. He is not sure why we are giving funds to the Marshall <br />Road underpass. <br />Mayor Muckle agreed on the Marshall Road issue, Louisville already put in more than our <br />share on that area but if our funds bring it to fruition it might be worth it. <br />Mayor Muckle agreed with Councilmember Maloney on South Boulder Road that we can't <br />commit that much money to one location, the at -grade makes sense. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.