My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 04 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2004-2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2019 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2019 04 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:20:29 AM
Creation date
4/16/2019 2:44:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCPKT 2019 04 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />March 11, 2019 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />community that we are in partnership with them. This projects sends this <br />message. We aren't giving Boulder Creek Neighborhoods $1.1 m, they are <br />generating it for us. He agrees with Commissioner Dalton that Council needs to <br />decide. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton said to not enter using public funds to support private <br />business lightly. This needs careful consideration. Instincts tell him that this <br />needs process at Council level. LRC will have to partner and interact with <br />council. He believes it is ill advised to send it for Council consideration without <br />more conversations with Council. He recommends continuing the item. Policy <br />guidance needs to be developed and the LRC needs to align with Council to <br />achieve goals. He distributed Business Assistance Criteria. He does not feel <br />comfortable moving this forward today. He believes the LRC should use the <br />upcoming Study Session with Council and LRC to develop criteria. <br />Commissioner Gorsevski said similar to what Commissioner Lathrop said: help <br />has always been infrastructure but the Sam's Club UR Area takes this tool into <br />a new direction. He is open to the Terraces project. But he is also open to <br />further discussions. He said the LRC wants to get this right. There needs to be <br />follow-up. <br />Commissioner Dalton said business assistance was developed 13 years ago <br />which is on a smaller scale for a project like this. The Business Assistance <br />Program is similar in that the city shares with the business the revenues <br />generated that the city wouldn't see without the business investment. This is an <br />extension of policy already developed. If it unleashes more applicants, terrific. <br />What is the issue with that? Policy alignment — Council needs to provide us with <br />guidance. There is no unified direction on Council. Council cannot hide behind <br />LRC being more cooperative with Council. Stimulate discussion by sending this <br />to council. Council needs to provide direction. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton said it is important to have the tool have independence <br />from Council. He thinks the importance of having defined policy and <br />constructive dialogue to reach alignment. His preference is to have <br />conversations in advance. <br />City Manager Balser said the LRC does have its purpose per state statute. The <br />duty given to LRC has process. If this moves forward it does not preclude other <br />conversations. We have done some of this work. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.