Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Utility Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Friday, April 12, 2019 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />saying we could do what if's with this table. Mr. Kowar agreed. Mr. Peterson said <br />on this table Multi -family is underpaying on their cost of service. It's not adding of <br />Multi -family but they are paying in their equity. Councilmember Stolzmann <br />asked if everyone was on the same page as far as scenarios on this table. Mr. <br />Kowar confirmed we will create scenarios that include multiple years that validate <br />demand factor, as is a single class and then possibly at a tap level, then we will <br />break out commercial indoor and commercial irrigation and include total MGDs. <br />Committee moved on to the 2017 water COS and Mr. Peterson explained the <br />breakdown between the accounts. Mayor Muckle asked if the 2017 numbers are <br />correct. Mr. Peterson said they will go back and do the process but there will be <br />some movement. Mr. Kowar continued saying we'll run some bookend math on <br />the different classes then we'll know. The Committee agreed with that. <br />Utility Financial Review and Rate Setting Plan Steps <br />1 a) Review COS Customer Classes — Councilmember Stolzmann asked what <br />kind of time frame you need to be able to be prepared but give you enough time <br />to set rates. Mr. Kowar said we won't be able to have anything until the July <br />meeting and we would have to set the 2021 rates off of this ruff cost of service. If <br />we got done with our deep dive then plug in the model at the last minute. We are <br />willing to do this if you are. Councilmember Stolzmann summarized what Mr. <br />Kowar said by saying if we finish the COS Policy setting and Rate Policy Setting <br />in enough time to have an impact for the 2020 Rates but if it doesn't, we will have <br />to set our 2020 Rates and we'll use our status quo. She asked if everyone is <br />okay with this and all agreed. Councilmember Maloney asked if we could add <br />"and policies" to Item #2 Rate Design. Councilmember Stolzmann confirmed we <br />are to add "and Policies" to item 1 a) and item 2 of the steps listed. She asked if <br />there is anything more on item la before we move onto the Rate Design. Are <br />there topics that we want to air about rate design that we need more background <br />on before we bring it to July meeting. Councilmember Maloney asked beyond <br />what Mr. Peterson has already written down to do? Councilmember Stolzmann <br />explained we talked about COS but within the Rate Design if you could just say <br />we have a flat rate you could say that we have a water budget. Mr. Peterson <br />said to backup Rate Design your choices are Flat Rate, Uniform Block Structure, <br />Decrease Block (like they do back east) or Water Budget. Councilmember <br />Stolzmann stated it's like a bulk discount. Committee discussed the scenarios of <br />commercial, residential, etc. Mayor Muckle said he has no interest in changing <br />from an Increasing Block Structure but is okay with tweaking the structure but is <br />concerned about what the cost is between customer class and the rates we are <br />actually charging but the basic structure we are charging the lowest price but <br />giving more water. Staff continued talking about structure and blocks and <br />concluded with Mr. Kowar saying we will run the scenarios. <br />Proposed Rate Adjustment — Mr. Kowar asked if everyone wanted benchmark <br />information on rates. Ashely said yes and moved to the next agenda item. <br />6 <br />