My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2019 09 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2019 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2019 09 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:59 PM
Creation date
9/19/2019 9:27:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 3 2019 <br />Page 9 of 14 <br />Councilmember Leh asked if the City can impose that kind if restriction on this kind of <br />speech City Attorney Kelly suggested if Council wants to make a substantive change it <br />should be run by the specialized legal counsel retained for this project. <br />Director Zuccaro noted all of the other temporary sign categories have a number <br />limitation <br />Public Comments <br />Jill Midgley, 3068 W 11th Avenue, Broomfield, stated she is a real estate agent in town <br />and she would like to have some ability to have open house signs on surrounding streets <br />to point people to the house She stated she needs signs to get people into the houses <br />Alicia Miller, 827 Trail Ridge Drive, a real estate agent, stated limits for days and times <br />would be fair but strategically placed directional signs are helpful and necessary for real <br />estate Window signs can be great and give a nice community feel <br />Caleb Dickinson, 721 Grant Ave , stated it can be too strict if kids can't have a lemonade <br />stand or the like Sometimes the temporary signs are helpful and Council should consider <br />some opportunity for them <br />Elayne Oligschlaeger, 1021 Turnberry Cir, does business open houses twice a year and <br />would like the ability to have temporary signs to get people to her house <br />Councilmember Leh stated he would support some allowances for temporary signs He <br />asked staff bring to back a proposal <br />Councilmember Leh asked for more clarity on the references to federal and state laws <br />and the first amendment as well as the phrase about being more restrictive <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated currently signs are not allowed in the public right of <br />way so what you see now is not allowed The proposal is to keep that. She would support <br />some amount of signage under certain rules She supports the modification for the <br />changes to US 36 facing signs <br />Councilmember Loo stated allowing signs with certain rules will mean some will not <br />comply and some will always break the rules and we don't have the ability to enforce that. <br />This could encourage people to go nuts with signs in the right of way for the weekends <br />and could detract from our natural areas She noted she gets complaints about people <br />who are already breaking the rules Enforcement could be an issue if signs were allowed <br />on certain days and times. <br />Councilmember Keany stated he is not in favor of allowing signs in rights of way as <br />people will abuse it. There is a way for people to put out signs on private property, but <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.