Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />November 4, 2019 <br />Page 6 of 20 <br />third party review, and the community benefits. The applicant and LRC members are <br />present. <br />Applicant — David Sinkey, Boulder Creek Homes 712 Main Street, thanked the outgoing <br />Councilmembers for their service. He asked for consideration of three points 1) this is not <br />a City subsidy, but a rebate; 2) approval is no financial risk to the City, and 3) adding <br />complexity to the TIF proposal hurts the project. He stated many people feel the free <br />market should dictate this without City help, however this is not a free market building as <br />there are requirements based beyond the market forces. The Code and PUD <br />requirements mandate higher design. <br />He stated these financial tools are at work in other cities. If approved and the building is <br />never built there is no risk to the City. If approved and built the likelihood of increased <br />sales tax is enhanced and there will be increased property taxes. If complexity is added to <br />the agreement it is unnecessary and distracting. The purpose of these tools is to <br />encourage private investors to invest in the area. He noted he and his partners are long <br />term stakeholders in the City. <br />Mayor Muckle asked if members of the LRC had anything to add. <br />Steve Fisher, chairperson LRC, noted the Commission had mixed feelings about this. He <br />encouraged approval of the request. Boulder Creek is a good company and neighbor. <br />Having the third party analysis was a good addition to the process. <br />Lexi Adler, LRC vice chair, stated she supports the application and encourages approval. <br />The third party review was important. Both EPS and staff provided the proof of the need <br />for this request. She noted other cities are using these tools. She would like Council to <br />support the application and this local employer. If they left it would negatively impact our <br />community. The potential sales tax generation and a retail/office mix should be supported. <br />This will stimulate growth and reinvestment in the area. <br />Debra Baskett, LRC member, spoke in favor and urged Council to approve the 90% <br />rebate. There is a real gap in the costs. The resulting revenues would be good for <br />Louisville. She stated Council should not be discussing a required retail use as it hampers <br />the applicant with their lender. <br />Public Comments <br />Mark Oberholzer, 224 Hoover Avenue, stated he owns Tilt and is chair of the Business <br />Retention and Development Committee (BRaD). He stated BRaD supports this type of a <br />tool and Council should use it when appropriate. <br />As a neighboring business owner he personally supports the project to help downtown <br />and the City should do what it can to help the project move forward. He stated he feels <br />the numbers in the analysis are conservative. <br />