City Council Minutes 1997 09 16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Howard and Levihn denied Mayer's friendly amendment as it was a secondary road. Mayer moved that Council amend Howard's motion stating that the landscaping improvements for the road directly abutting the secondary access, as proposed, be completed within 18 months of the issuance of C.O. of the first building completed, seconded by Sisk. Davidson called for any discussion on the amendment. NONE Davidson called for a roll call on the amendment. Motion failed by a 3 - 4 vote with Keany, Howard, Lathrop, and Levihn voting against. Davidson called for any further discussion on the original motion. Keany offered a friendly amendment that the plexiglass covering on the neon signs will be opaque, not clear, that there will no exposed neon in the signs. Howard and seconder Levihn accepted that. Keany offered another friendly amendment that after the overlot grading was done, the ovedot grading would be seeded with native seed so there are no piles of dirt or dirt laying around until Phase II is completed. Howard and seconder Levihn accepted that. Sisk offered a friendly amendment that, based upon the representations of the applicants, that there would be no light spilling off-site. If there is light spillage, the applicants would make and take corrective actions to effectively keep the lighting contained within the site. Howard and seconder Levihn accepted that. Roll call was taken on the amended Resolution No. 41. Motion passed by a 6 - 0 vote with Mayer voting against. RESOLUTION NO. 42, SERIES 1997 - FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LOTS 4 & 5, BLOCK 2 CTC - THE LADLEY BUILDING Sisk asked to be excused from this discussion as his law firm represents the architectural firm involved in this project. Lathrop asked to be excused as his son is married to Mr. Ladley's daughter.