My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2008 03 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2008 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2008 03 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:22 PM
Creation date
2/20/2009 11:24:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2008 03 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 19, 2008 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br />He noted that the Main Street program offers technical assistance including a <br />“Community Revitalization Partnership Team” which is a group of downtown <br />professionals that can come and help the downtown. Such a visit costs $3000 - $6000, <br />but 50% can be reimbursed by the Department of Local Affairs. It would cover a 1-2 day <br />visit. The end result of which is a written report of findings to help guide the downtown. <br /> <br />Kron stated that a full Main Street program is lengthier and more expensive - $20,000. <br />Cities must qualify for such a visit. Some of the communities that have gone through the <br />program include: Brush, Steamboat Springs, Monte Vista, Granby, Arvada, and <br />Berthoud. <br /> <br />Muckle asked for questions from the public. <br /> <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 Choke Cherry Drive, asked if the program could offer <br />suggestions of financing techniques. <br /> <br />Kron stated that a resource team can address that. He noted other communities have <br />used everything from special districts and bonding to grants for financing. <br /> <br />Muckle thanked Kron for his presentation. <br /> <br />Update – Louisville Middle School Demolition <br />Muth reported that the City Council had passed a resolution urging the school district to <br />reevaluate its decision to demolish the historic section of Louisville Middle School. The <br />resolution was completed in preparation for a meeting tomorrow in which the City <br />Manager and two City Councilmembers will meet with the Superintendent and two <br />members of the school board. The City Manager will report on that meeting at the April 1 <br />City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Koertje reported that the Superintendent King had also received letters in support of <br />saving the school from the National Trust for Historic Preservation and Paul Weissman. <br />Koertje hoped to get Senator Brandon Schaffer to comment as well. <br /> <br />Koertje reported that at a School Board meeting in February a number of residents <br />spoke. <br /> <br />Muckle asked for public comments. There were none. <br /> <br />Possible Ballot Question Regarding Historic Preservation Funding <br />Muth reported that at the March 11 City Council study session Council discussed the <br />possibility of putting a question on the November ballot regarding a sales tax to support <br />historic preservation. Should Council choose to move forward with this, they have until <br />July to set the ballot title and thereby place it on the November ballot. <br /> <br />Whiteman asked how much such a tax would raise. Muth stated she did not know exact <br />numbers at this time. <br /> <br />Muckle asked for public comments. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.