My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2008 07 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2008 Planning Commission Agendas and Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2008 07 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:32:24 AM
Creation date
3/25/2020 2:54:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of Human Services in regards to class size and occupancy. The applicant has stated that they are <br />in compliance with the Colorado Department of Human Services (please refer to the letter from <br />the applicant dated June 12, 2008). <br />SPECIAL REVIEW USE CRITERIA: <br />Louisville Municipal Code § 17.40.100.A lists five criteria to be considered by the Planning <br />Commission in reviewing a Special Review Use application, which follow. The Planning <br />Commission is authorized to place conditions on their recommendation of approval, if they <br />believe those are necessary to comply with all of the criteria. <br />1. That the proposed use/development is consistent in all respects with the spirit and intent <br />of the comprehensive plan and of this chapter, and that it would not be contrary to the <br />general welfare and economic prosperity of the city or the immediate neighborhood; <br />Staff would concur with the applicant that this sort of daycare/school use is an enhancement to <br />the community and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's stated desire to encourage an <br />appropriate range of uses to support the residents of the City. The facility is a benefit to the <br />immediate neighborhood in that it provides a location that is convenient to many of the residents <br />it is designed to benefit. That is, provided that any potential negative impacts associated with <br />having the facility in a residential area can be appropriately mitigated. <br />Staff believes this criterion has been met. <br />2. That such use/development will lend economic stability, compatible with the character of <br />any surrounding established areas; <br />As with the above response, Staff acknowledges that this type of service use, integrated into a <br />neighborhood, can be a convenience and asset for the adjacent residents and thereby lends <br />economic stability to the area, provided that any potential negative impacts (parking, drop-off) <br />are adequately mitigated. <br />Staff believes this criterion has been met. <br />3. That the use/development is adequate for the internal efficiency of the proposal, <br />considering the functions of residents, recreation, public access, safety and such factors <br />including storm drainage facilities, sewage and water facilities, grades, dust control and <br />such other factors directly related to public health and convenience; <br />The applicant is making necessary site improvements to increase the efficiency of the proposal <br />for the existing neighborhood. With the addition of a student drop off area on Main Street, there <br />is adequate area to queue for drop off and pick up that should not interfere with existing traffic <br />flow on Main Street. <br />Staff believes this criterion has been met. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.