Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> <br />Local Licensing Authority <br />Meeting Date: May 15, 2000 <br /> <br />Agreement that states "other than the assets described in Section 1.1, no other assets of Seller shall be <br />sold or assigned". Attorney Moore stated that the attorney for the transferor included that section <br />using "boiler-plate" language and that the lack of compliance in providing the exhibits did not stand <br />in the way of the sale. He continued that Holly & Mike' s Ribs, Inc. did the best they could with the <br />lack of cooperation received from the seller. Mr. Moore stated he did not know how to address the <br />lack of diligence issue to the Authority's satisfaction. <br /> <br />Member Lipton asked Mr. Moore if he or his clients attempted to get the written consent of transfer <br />from the current license holder. Attorney Moore stated that he had been hired by Holly & Mike's <br />Ribs, Inc. for sole purpose of obtaining the substantial, competent evidence required by the Local <br />Licensing Authority's Rules of Procedure section 5(b). <br /> <br />Member Lipton asked if Holly & Mike's Ribs, Inc. had used an attorney throughout the purchase <br />process. Holly Ortiz stated that Attorney Kevin Moore represented them and reviewed the contract <br />agreement. Mr. Moore stated that he thoroughly reviewed the contract but was not asked to be <br />present at the closing. <br /> <br />Member Kimmett asked if by the term contract, Attorney Moore was referring to the Asset Purchase <br />Agreement. Mr. Moore responded "yes." Kimmett asked if at the time he reviewed the Asset <br />Purchase Agreement, he asked about the missing Exhibit B. Attorney Moore stated that he did ask <br />about the missing exhibit and was told the information would be provided at closing. <br /> <br />Member Lipton asked Ms. Ortiz if she recalled any conversation with David L. Woodard or Barbara <br />J. Woodard specifically concerning the liquor license. Ms. Ortiz stated that she had worked at the <br />Kaddy Shack for David Woodard for four years. She continued that, in November, 1999 when Mr. <br />Woodard signed the temporary permit application that he was giving his consent and that she <br />believed he meant for them to have the liquor license. <br /> <br />Member Lipton noted that a letter from the current license holder's attorney, Kim I. McCullough of <br />Smith McCullough, P.C., dated May 12, 2000 states a belief by the Woodards that transfer had been <br />completed at the time of the sale. <br /> <br />Attorney Moore stated that numerous other conditions of implied consent are contained throughout <br />the May 12, 2000 letter from Kim I. McCullough. Mr. Moore continued that paragraph (3) of the <br />second page of the letter states that "the Woodards find it surprising and disturbing that their names <br />still appear on any document pertaining to the operation of the "Hickory Sticks" restaurant and are <br />concerned that this will or could result in liability to them resulting from HMR's negligence in <br />acquiring their own liquor license." <br /> <br />Member Lipton asked if the statement ending in paragraph 4 of page 1 and continuing in paragraph 1 <br />of page 2 of the May 12, 2000 letter from Kim I. McCullough, stating "Kaddy Shack and the <br />Woodards went well beyond what was required by any contract to attempt to accommodate HMR's <br />acquisition of the restaurant located on South Boulder Road in Louisville, Colorado, including all <br />steps necessary to pave the way for a smooth transition of the liquor license from the Woodards to <br />your clients," could be considered substantial competent evidence of consent to the transfer. <br /> <br />\~FRED\VARRANXLIQUOR~2000~IINUTESWIINUTES051500SPECIAL.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />