My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 06 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 06 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2020 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
6/12/2020 8:41:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/11/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
6/12/2020 10:37 AM
Modified:
6/12/2020 10:37 AM
Text:
https://library.municode.com/co/louisville/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17ZO_CH17.28PLUNDE_S17.28.120CRDEPL
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1445
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that could be required at the time of PUD review under Municipal Code Sec. 17.28.080. <br />This code section states that the need for open space in addition to that required as part <br />of a subdivision under Sec. 16.16.060 will be evaluated based on the following factors: <br />1. Comprehensive development plan (including matters of state interest); <br />2. Topography, drainage, vegetation and other such physical conditions; <br />3. Anticipated socio-economic conditions; <br />4. Type and density of development and employment; <br />5. Overall need for open space and recreational facilities <br />This requested provision is noted in Sec. 2.1 of the draft development agreement <br />(Attachment No. 7). The development agreement is described in more detail below. <br />At the time of PUD review, if any waivers are requested, the waiver criteria under Sec. <br />17.28.110 state that additional usable open space may be required in consideration of <br />the waivers or demonstration that the needs of residents for usable or functional open <br />space can be met. The applicant is not requesting any credits towards this potential <br />future obligation with the GDP application. <br />Sec. 17.28.110 ...any such requirements may be waived or modified through the <br />approval process of the planned unit development if the spirit and intent of the <br />development plan criteria contained in section 17.28.120 are met and the city council <br />finds that the development plan contains areas allocated for usable open space in <br />common park area in excess of public use dedication requirements or that the <br />modification or waiver is warranted by the design and amenities incorporated in the <br />development plan, and the needs of residents for usable or functional open space and <br />buffer areas can be met. <br />The plans also include establishment of a conservation easement on a contiguous 36- <br />acre parcel south of the GDP boundary located in the City and County of Broomfield. <br />Density and Height <br />The proposal includes varying building heights ranging from two to five stories and up to <br />90 ft. in height. Under Municipal Code Sec. 17.72.1190, yard and bulk standards (which <br />includes building heights) should be stated on a GDP, but must be in "general <br />conformance" with the underlying zoning standards. Because the proposed heights are <br />not in "general conformance" with the underlying zoning, which only allows 35 ft. in <br />building height, the proposed GDP notes that the building height proposal will require <br />approval through the Planned Unit Development waiver process. <br />The average development density for the entire property, excluding public land <br />dedications and rights of way, is an FAR of 0.48. The FARs within each parcel ranges <br />between .25 and 1.08. Parcel C, which is planned as a mixed -use walkable subdistrict <br />has the highest density with an FAR of 1.08, followed by Parcel A, which is the location <br />of the senior living community, with an FAR of 0.69. Parcel B, which is the planned <br />corporate headquarter for Medtronic has an FAR of 0.13 and Parcels C and D have an <br />FAR of 0.25. <br />Redtail Ridge Comprehensive Plan and GDP Amendments Page 7 of 32 <br />PC — June 11, 2020 <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.