Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 11, 2020 <br />Page 8 of 19 <br />Zuccaro says that is correct. <br />Rice states that regarding the GDP, that does not speak to the issue of how high the <br />buildings are. <br />Zuccaro says that is correct because the municipal code for PCZD and GDP says you <br />have to have general conformance with the underlying zoning, which includes height, so <br />it prohibits a new height being set within the GDP. It can only be waved with the PUD. <br />Rice states that if planning commission ever gets to that stage and applicants present <br />these PUDs, that is where these decisions are made regarding building height. <br />Rice mentions that many of the public comments concern regards having potential five <br />stories buildings and that then affecting the views. If a developer were to have five story <br />buildings on this property, whose view corridor would be impeded by that? <br />Zuccaro says he is unsure if they would have a specific view that would be impacted. <br />He thinks the interior of the development certainly would have views blocked. For the <br />exterior of the development, the commissioners could ask the applicant to expand upon <br />their view corridor analysis. When staff was analyzing this, looking at Campus Drive, the <br />open space corridors on the north side by Campus Drive helps to preserve the open <br />views. <br />Rice asks regarding the fiscal analysis, what is the simple explanation of how a large <br />development like this, which should be generating large tax revenues, can end up in the <br />negative in some of these categories. <br />Zuccaro says that he thinks staff would have to work with the city's consultant in asking <br />what could be driving that in regards to revenues and funds. The mix of commercial and <br />residential has a significant impact though. Staff has to consider the estimated value of <br />the residential development and the amount of sales tax revenue that will be generated. <br />The senior living center's concept is one that would be a very self-sufficient community, <br />which means they would be using their dining halls and not needing to go to the grocery <br />store and so forth. Staff made many assumptions about sales tax capture. In the normal <br />residential neighborhoods that are within the city, staff made a much higher assumption <br />in the sales tax capture. Staff assumed that because the residential portion at Redtail <br />Ridge is more geographically on the outer portions of Louisville, the sales tax capture <br />would be lower. Those are some of the factors that could be driving that. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Geoff Baukol: <br />President of Brue Baukol Capital Partners <br />Baukol begins his presentation by introducing his company and reviewing Louisville's <br />principles and how those principles integrate with this development's vision. He then <br />begins his discussion of the public and fiscal benefit to Louisville. In regards to the <br />public benefit, he mentions the following: <br />• A dormant site that is now opened to the public <br />• A publicly dedicated land <br />11 <br />