Planning Commission Minutes 2020 06 11

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 11, 2020 Page 4 of 19 Staff Recommendations: The following is staff's recommendations to the commissioners: • Comprehensive Plan Amendment o Use the public hearing to review the amendment criteria and understand the community support • General Development Plan o If the commission support the comprehensive plan policy changes, staff recommends conditional approval of the GDP General Development Plan Conditions o Lower transmission poles adjacent to Rockcress Drive o Address outstanding public works comments on the drainage and utility plan o Add a note to the GDP requiring each PUD application to demonstrate acceptable roadway capacity before the development can proceed o Require authorization on the intersection improvements outside of the city o Add a GDP requirement on concurrent employment and commercial development with residential development Concurrency Requirements 0 600 Units of residential development on Parcel A are allowed with the first phase of corporate campus development on Parcel B. All phases of the residential development allowed on Parcel A following completion of all phases of corporate campus development on Parcel B o Limit residential development on Parcels C and D to 300 units until 1,500,000 sq. ft. of commercial development, inclusive of 25,000 sq. ft. of retail development is achieved in the GDP Planning Area Commissioner Questions of Staff. Moline asks if staff could confirm that the metro district boundaries are concurrent with this development proposal. Zuccaro says that it they are concurrent and will not affect the GDP boundary. Moline asks if staff could talk more about the transferable nature of the development between parcels C and D. Zuccaro says that there would be some natural limitations based on the size and shape of the parcels, but there could be some transfer between those parcels. Moline says that he would be interested to hear about the traffic impact and to compare between the existing traffic and how traffic would be if this development were approved. He is also interested in knowing what the proposed traffic impact was for the ConocoPhillips project. Rice asks if there is somebody who can speak to that question. Zuccaro mentions that the applicant will be reviewing that topic in more depth during their presentation. Howe asks if staff could explain how each parcel will be developed.