Planning Commission Minutes 2020 06 11

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 11, 2020 Page 3 of 19 Parcels C, D, E Proposal: • Mix of commercial and residential uses • 3,556,000 Sq. ft. — Transferable across parcels • 900 Multi -family residential units — Anticipated for Parcel C, but transferable between C and D • Parcel C intended as pedestrian -oriented mixed use development and includes design standards and intent for north -south Main Street, and plaza with minimum area of two acres • 224 of 900 Units designated for affordable housing (10% of 2,236 units proposed) • Concurrency requirement between residential and commercial development • Trail dedications Parcel F Proposal: • Open space and buffer • NW Parkway IGA requires buffer area Zuccaro then discusses the various public land dedications and the analyses of the required height and density, as well as the market trends and the potential for proposed land uses and phasing. Zuccaro spends time reviewing the traffic and mobility study as well as the site grading and drainage plans. The traffic and mobility study brings up the topic of what the estimated daily vehicle trips would be as well as the peak hours of weekday trips. From this study, recommendations for road improvements were made. The following are those recommendations: • Expand portions of 96th and 88th Streets to 4 lanes • New intersection at Campus Drive/NW Parkway • Intersection improvements at Rockcress/88th, Rockcress/NW Parkway, 88th/Dillon, NW Parkway/96th • US 36 Interchange fails without improvements in 2030 • Rockcress/NW Parkway and 96th/NW Parkway fail without improvements in 2040 Zuccaro speaks on the fiscal analysis and mentions the need to evaluate the costs for expanding city services and revenues from development, the expanded services for the new residents and employees, and the ongoing city maintenance. Zuccaro concludes his presentation by reviewing the Comprehensive Plan Analysis criteria. The criteria is as follows: A. The amendment request is consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the comprehensive plan of the city. B. The amendment request will not result in adverse impacts to existing or planned services to the citizens of the city. C. The amendment request demonstrates a need exists for the amendment through either changed conditions or past error which support adjustments to the city's comprehensive plan. D. The planning commission and/or city council may consider other factors in reviewing an application as they deem appropriate and may request additional information which is necessary for an adequate review and evaluation of the amendment.