Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 12', 2019 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br />Libhart added that the funding scenarios were meant to help the City with budgeting and <br />practicality conversations in the future. <br />Moline liked that the approach to funding was good in the plan because it looked at <br />different funding avenues. He suggested to Council that they consider different ways to <br />fund these improvements. <br />Williams added that Moline's suggestion also allowed the plan to spread out the pain <br />and not overtax any one area. <br />Howe noted that the downside of scenario 3 might be limited flexibility in the future. <br />Ritchie replied that the Plan was meant to be updated over time as needed, <br />approximately every 5-8 years. <br />Rice quoted from the staff report: <br />It is important to note that the plan reflects a particular moment in time. The <br />TMP should provide guidance, but City priorities may change over time and <br />transportation decisions will need to reflect these updated community <br />needs, opportunities and priorities. The City should update the TMP <br />periodically to ensure consistency with changing conditions. <br />Williams added that the TMP was like the Comp Plan in that way. <br />Moline added that the CIP planning horizon was approximately 5 years as well. <br />Ritchie noted that Council would take the TMP into account among all the other funding <br />demands of the City. <br />Libhart noted that scenarios 2 and 3 provided more flexibility to the City with how the <br />implement the plan. <br />Howe observed that it was important to understand that the Commission thought the <br />plan was important to invest in. He noted that while the community wanted to prioritize <br />biking and walking, 93% of people who work in Louisville commute from elsewhere and <br />efficiency in auto movement was still important, as was making streets more efficient <br />overall. He recommended looking at the high crash locations to guide future <br />conversations. Safety should be a priority and policy 4 could improve safety. There were <br />also a lot of collisions on South Boulder Road and the corridor going downtown and <br />looking at that area should be a priority. He also noted that consistent signposting <br />across the city would help make the system less confusing. He agreed with the <br />importance of separating bikes and cars, taking into account where people are coming <br />from and where they're trying to get to. <br />Libhart noted that commute trips in Louisville were significant, but about 60% of all trips <br />were not commute trips. <br />Howe responded that making the streets more efficient would also help people who <br />were moving across town. <br />12 <br />