My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 03 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 03 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:24:11 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
3/12/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 12, 2015 <br />Page 9 of 23 <br />Tengler asks about the amount of traffic it may bring. What are the typical guests and the <br />typical traffic patterns associated with this clientele? Any ambulances or emergency vehicles? <br />Messaros says the majority of traffic is related to employees. Patients will be brought in by <br />hospital van. There will be typical traffic use patterns seen at a medical facility such as a <br />hospital. Patients will receive visitors on occasion. It is not busy at night but visitors may come <br />at night outside business hours. Ambulances will not be a typical situation. <br />Robinson says he has the allowed institutional uses would be from the draft amendment to the <br />development agreement. City Council still has to agree to it. Draft states "institutional use is <br />permitted for Parcel G2 shall be limited to the following: medical clinics, rehabilitative nursing <br />facilities, convalescent centers, skilled nursing facilities, acute treatment units, home care <br />agencies, hospice care, assisted living facilities, and long term care facilities". <br />Public Comment: <br />Priscilla Carlson and Dave Bahr, 1053 West Century Drive, Unit 208, Louisville, CO 80027 <br />She states there are vacant buildings in the area. If there are buildings already built and vacant, <br />why can they not be used? She and her husband were at the recent McCaslin Corridor meeting <br />and mention was made of a blended Main Street versus McCaslin. Parks were discussed. If <br />there are resources that are empty, perhaps they could be considered. <br />Robert Snyder, Century Lofts, 1057 Century Drive, Unit 321, Louisville, CO 80027 <br />He lives on the third floor and enjoys a good view to the west. He is concerned about increased <br />traffic in the neighborhood. The design shows the parking lot next to an existing parking lot. It <br />sounds like more traffic to the residential area. He mentions that Louisville has a "hospital zone" <br />where Avista Hospital is located. Perhaps this would be a better location for this venue. <br />Peter Wolton, 1112 Hillside Lane, Louisville, CO 80027 <br />He lives in the neighborhood to the west of the property. He also works at Plexus at 285 <br />Century Place in the middle of the business park. He walks around the field on a daily basis. He <br />has talked with his neighbors and is happy to hear the facility will not be a drug and alcohol <br />rehabilitation center. He is concerned about increased noise pollution and traffic from the <br />employees. He asks about shifts and when they begin and end. He asks if they could be <br />coordinated with rush hour traffic. He wonders about a graveyard shift which typically begins at <br />11 pm. He also mentions the McCaslin Small Plan Area which wants to make it a vibrant <br />urban/suburban area. He does not think a surgery rehab center seems to fit in with this growth <br />plan. He does not think it will draw people into shops. <br />Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: <br />Russ mentions about the small area planning process. The City did not place a moratorium on <br />development here. It is not governed by the small area plan or the planning process. The PC is <br />being asked to review this application against the existing regulation, the Commercial <br />Development Design Standards and Guidelines within the Centennial Valley GDP. It can be <br />confusing to the public. The McCaslin Study was just begun and the purpose is to update the <br />standards to which this project is judged against. <br />Robinson recommends approval of Centennial Valley Skilled Nursing: Resolution 10, Series <br />2015, A resolution recommending approval of a final planned unit development (PUD) and <br />general development plan (GDP) amendment for a new 44,000 square foot, 48 bed skilled <br />rehabilitation facility at 1107 Century Drive, Lot 1, Block 3, Centennial Valley Business Park 1, <br />with the two conditions. <br />1. The trash and generator enclosures shall be constructed of durable materials such as <br />stone, brick, or metal with dark finishes in compliance with section 6.1(F) of the CDDSG. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.