Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 9, 2015 <br />Page 11 of 27 <br />■ The commercial portion of the development shall provide a <br />parking space for every 500sf of the floor area rounded to nearest <br />500 sf. <br />■ The residential portion of the development shall adhere to the <br />following: <br />- 1-bdrm unit min: 1 space per unit; max: 1.25 spaces per unit <br />- 2-bdrm unit min: 2 spaces per unit <br />- 3-or-more-bedroom unit min: 2 spaces per unit <br />■ A parking requirement waiver may be requested when a <br />demonstrated shared parking analysis is provided. <br />■ The parking requirement is waived for Louisville Landmarked <br />structures with approved alteration certificate. <br />o Commercial Community (CC) zone district shall comply with: <br />■ Outside of Downtown - Commercial Development Design <br />Standards and Guidelines (CDDSG). <br />■ In Downtown — The Downtown Handbook <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Resolution No. 13, Series 2015, recommending City Council approval of an ordinance <br />amending the Louisville Municipal Code (LMC) to define Live -Work uses and allow their <br />development in the Community Commercial and Mixed Use Zone Districts throughout Louisville <br />with two conditions. <br />1. The draft ordinance shall be modified to allow Live -Work in the area defined as <br />Downtown Louisville and the Mixed Use Zone District. <br />2. The draft ordinance shall be modified to add a note in the parking requirements <br />stating "the parking requirement is waived for Louisville Landmarked structures <br />incorporating Live -Work." <br />Commission Questions of Staff. - <br />O'Connell makes motion to enter emails from Peter Stewart, Thursday, April 9, 2015, and <br />revised Resolution No. 13, seconded by Brauneis, voice vote, passes. <br />Rice asks from a property tax standpoint, using commercial property both in a commercial and a <br />residential style, how does that affect the classification for purposes of property tax? <br />Russ says he doesn't know, but he would refer that to the City Finance Director. The Finance <br />Director was referred this project and he felt comfortable with the ordinance that he could <br />implement it. <br />Russell asks if there is an expectation that requires there be a connection between who is living <br />there and who is working there? <br />Russ says there is not in this ordinance. In theory, the intent is the shop -owner lives and works <br />in the same site. In reality, that may not happen. There is a condition that it shall not subdivide. <br />A number of scenarios could be owner on site, rents out commercial, or rents out residential and <br />works on site, or rent out both. Only one owner. <br />Russell asks what is the ordinance trying to accomplish? <br />Russ says it gives a tremendous economic value to the smaller lots of Downtown. On long <br />narrow lots, you can retain a smaller scale investment and give economic value. There is a <br />strong demand for single family. It is lower demand on the school district than multi -family. It <br />gives the economic value of residential but commercial remains. Downtown's unique <br />commercial storefronts, being the scale they are, will be able to get incentives for preservation. <br />