Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 9, 2015 <br />Page 16 of 27 <br />O'Connell comfortable moving forward. Russell comfortable moving forward. <br />Pritchard says that he wants Comm. Rice's concerns are noted to City Council and an answer is <br />prepared for him. <br />Russ says that this is one of many potential dynamos of any single ordinance much like the <br />water ordinance. Chapter 3 in the Municipal Code governs revenue and finance of the City and <br />that is why it was referred to the Finance Director. If there are necessary modifications to clarify <br />property taxes and how they work, that would be an ordinance brought forward to City Council. <br />Planning Commission does not have jurisdiction. Russ can pass PC concern on to the Finance <br />Director, but he assures Comm. Rice that the Finance Director has reviewed this ordinance. <br />Rice clarifies that the Finance Director's answer that there was "zero" fiscal impact. What was <br />the answer? What is the need to move forward now as opposed to in a month? Is this <br />something that has time sensitivity to it? <br />Russ states there was no net change and no significant impact to the fiscal resources to the <br />City. There is some private interest to it from a City perspective, so we want to get it right. If <br />there are concerns that you think affect Chapter 17 in the LMC, I would recommend you wait. <br />Chapter 3 is the Finance and Revenue section of the City and it is under the City Council <br />subcommittee called the Finance Committee that reviews all recommended ordinances that <br />impact that portion of the City. We can delay this if it is important to you. <br />Rice clarifies that the PC is voting on land use under Chapter 17 and not anything having to do <br />with fiscal impact. Why is fiscal impact part of our discussion when it has nothing to do with what <br />PC is considering? <br />Russ says the City Manager has directed that whenever there is communication affecting the <br />Municipal Code or change in zoning or amendment to the Comp Plan, Staff must document for <br />information purposes. It is continued to City Council who has a direct job in assessing it. <br />Motion made by Brauneis to approve Resolution No. 13, Series 2015, seconded by O'Connell. <br />Roll call vote. <br />Name <br />Vote <br />Chris Pritchard <br />Yes <br />Jeff Moline <br />Yes <br />Ann O'Connell <br />Yes <br />Cary Ten ler <br />N/A <br />Steve Brauneis <br />Yes <br />Scott Russell <br />Yes <br />Tom Rice <br />Yes with reservations passed to City Council <br />Motion passed/failed: <br />Pass <br />Motion passes 6-0. <br />Meeting paused for break at 8:45, resumed at 8:55 pm. <br />Russ asks Chairman Pritchard to ask for a show of hands from the audience regarding their <br />intention to speak on the Small Area Plan — McCaslin and the Small Area Plan — South Boulder <br />Road. Pritchard states that the PC will not entertain any additional topics at 10 pm. The Small <br />Area Plan — McCaslin will be discussed first and the Small Area Plan - South Boulder Road may <br />not be addressed. Pritchard asks the PC if an overflow meeting is possible on April 23, 2015, <br />