Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 13, 2015 <br />Page 11 of 22 <br />McCartney says we have public nuisance standards in the LMC that we use for any property. <br />We are on a complaint -driven basis because of limited Staff to go out property by property. If it <br />was brought to us as a complaint, we would go out and enforce the Code. <br />Russell says there is a mechanism for a neighbor or community member to come out and say <br />"this is a problem". Could we include a condition that is related to noise? <br />McCartney says we have a noise ordinance that we apply to a building contractor. There are <br />hours. We can use the same type of standard. The PC can add a condition. <br />Russell asks about the appendix and the applicant's submittal of a sign on the property that <br />says No Dumping. Is that an issue on this site currently? <br />McCartney says I am not aware of it. We have received no information. <br />Summary from Applicant: <br />Mary Ann Heaney says our bylaws and guidelines will prohibit any kind of electronic equipment <br />in the garden, so no boom boxes. If they want ear pods, they can bring them. We think this is a <br />real asset to the community. In discussions with Boulder County and Growing Gardens who <br />manage the Kerr Garden, they have absolutely no plans to expand that garden. If there are <br />empty plots this summer, it is the first time in years. Every year, I call and ask "how backed up <br />are you?" and "I'm just making sure that we are still on track." I think this is a real asset to the <br />City of Louisville and that is the way most cities look at it. You are taking a piece of land and <br />bringing citizens together in an activity that takes very little management and time by the City. <br />We are bringing a new type of recreational activity for which citizens are almost completely <br />responsible. I think this is something really good for the City of Louisville. <br />Questions from Commission for Applicant: <br />Tengler asks if someone signs up for a plot Year 1, do they get that in perpetuity until they <br />decide to not use it anymore? Is there a lottery every year? <br />Heaney says most gardens work that way. Again, once the first group of gardeners is selected, <br />they can refine the bylaws to determine that. <br />Tengler asks in the selection process, will you make any allowances for low income families or <br />any other charitable organizations so they get prioritized, or is there an allocation for groups like <br />that? <br />Heaney says we have discussed the entire process. We have talked about having scholarship <br />gardens of people of lower income who need it. We discussed a certain percentage of plots, but <br />we will see how it shakes out with the first people who apply. <br />Closed Public Hearing and discussion by Commission: <br />Tengler says it is obvious from the letters that there are some strong feelings on both sides of <br />this issue. The comments from the neighbors deal with the things we hear about on a regular <br />basis in PC ... noise, traffic, potential for trespassing. They are legitimate concerns. By the <br />same token, I think there is a lot of public benefit to something like this. The communal aspect of <br />it, the general benefit especially if we are looking to provide plots allocated to low income <br />families, and to charitable organizations. I think in general, I am in favor of this. I would like to <br />consider as a condition, some sort of traffic controls. It could be a four-way STOP or four official <br />crosswalks so we can allay some of the concerns about the traffic. In a couple of the notes and <br />a couple of the public comments, there is a notion of this being green space. I object to that. <br />This is an empty corner lot with thistle and weeds. It is not open space and while it may have <br />been a benefit to the residents in that area, it is not designated as such. It is not a park and it is <br />not open space. I think this is one where we look at the greater public good rather than a <br />personal convenience for 20 or 40 houses in that area. <br />Moline says I think this is going to change this corner a little bit. I think it is a change that takes <br />public land and does something with it that enriches the community beyond what is there now. I <br />really think this is going to be a benefit to the neighborhood and the City as a whole. I am <br />