Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 13, 2015 <br />Page 12 of 22 <br />impressed by the way LSAB led this project over the course of a number of years and was able <br />to find a spot in the City that will work for this. It is an important thing to keep in mind. The City <br />is going to be thoughtful about how it chooses places to take public land and not privatize it, but <br />do something a little different with it than just leaving it open to all kinds of public use. I am <br />impressed by the fact that this went through a number of different processes to help select this <br />site. I am in support. <br />O'Connell says based on the comments and feedback from people who have concerns on this, I <br />would be in favor but I would like to consider some sort of condition about traffic and controlling. <br />I think the painted crosswalks would be a really good thing at the very least. I would also like to <br />hear other Commissioner comments about the possibility of a condition regarding trash or <br />having a compost pile available so the concerns about litter can be allayed. <br />Russell says I like the idea of community gardens. I travel all over the country. When I take the <br />train into downtown Seattle from the airport, I pass multiple community gardens. It is a great <br />means of food production but generally, I view it as a great expression of community value. I <br />am supportive of it. I think if we create a central collection point for compost and trash, we are <br />in fact creating the problem we are trying to avoid. I think the behavioral pressure within this <br />community will address this problem, and if it doesn't, I have no doubt there will be people <br />watching and will respond to it. I am conscious of the fact that even though it is meaningless <br />land, we are converting public land to private use. We are essentially privatizing public realm, <br />putting it in the hands of people who are producing food for their pleasure and their benefit. My <br />only call to the community gardens and the community it forms there is to be good neighbors, <br />reach out to those neighborhoods, to take care of that land, and be conscientious. I have never <br />heard a story, in all of my time around planning events, of complaints coming out of community <br />gardens. This group needs to work really hard to prove the community benefit beyond the <br />personal pleasure that we all take in growing vegetables. We are imposing a traffic control <br />condition on someone who can't really do it. But since this is the City, we can place that <br />expectation. A crosswalk is the most feasible to execute. I don't know about a four-way stop. <br />would be willing to include a condition that says no electronic devices and noise on the plot. <br />Rice says whenever there is development, it is always one of my concerns that there be some <br />ownership and accountability for whatever that development is. In the typical case where we <br />have a private property owner who comes in and makes a proposal for development, we know <br />who is accountable. When we come to something like this where we have a community use <br />with many users, up to 45 different plots being used, it becomes a concern of mine that although <br />we create development standards, those won't be met. Something like this can, no doubt, be <br />beautiful but it can also become unruly if the community doesn't control itself. I am pleased with <br />the idea that we have a garden association that ultimately becomes the accountable agency. I <br />am comfortable with that. I think the development standards they have created are good. There <br />have been a few suggestions tonight that we might add a few others. I am wondering about this <br />business of adding trash receptacles if these are something we are trying to avoid. I think part <br />of the unsightliness would be to have a bunch of trash cans lying around. I like the idea of "you <br />take out what you bring in or whatever you create there". We wouldn't have to worry about <br />accumulation. The other thing with trash barrels is that someone has to pick them up. I am sure <br />there has not been any arrangement made for that. I would like to hear other PC thoughts on <br />that, but I am concerned that trash barrels might create a problem we are trying to avoid. The <br />second thought I have is that whenever we do something different and new like this, there will <br />invariably be concerns about what is going to happen. As an attorney, we use the phrase <br />"parade of horribles" and that is the way it becomes. I am used to it but am sensitive to it <br />because this is a neighborhood where these folks live and they have a right to be concerned a <br />potential "parade of horribles." On the other hand, because we are doing this as a SRU, my <br />