My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 08 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 08 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:25:21 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/13/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 13, 2015 <br />Page 15 of 22 <br />even larger problem and issue that residents have been dealing with here. It affects the entire <br />City no matter what. <br />Rice says do we add to the development standards? <br />Russ says the PC makes a condition to the resolution. Staff will add it to the SRU for City <br />Council. <br />Rice says what if we add conditions that "the garden plots be for use by Louisville residents and <br />organizations only", "that no electronic devices be allowed in the gardens", and "the addition of <br />a crosswalk". <br />Russ says on the crosswalk, he has language he requests the PC consider because there is <br />engineering behind a potential crosswalk. "The City shall increase the visibility of the <br />intersection to motorists traveling along Garfield Street and Lincoln Avenue raising awareness <br />to pedestrians". <br />Russell says I am looking at the aerial that says Garfield Avenue and Griffith. You said Lincoln? <br />Russ says Garfield turns into Lincoln at this location. <br />Moline says I am not a fan of the condition about electronic devices. I think it is hard to enforce. <br />I think this is better left to the gardeners. We have noise ordinances. It will not, however, be <br />something that will clearly prevent me from voting for this. <br />Russell says there are a limited number of ways for this garden to really intrude on neighbors, <br />one of them very clearly is noise. I don't know what is involved in calling out the police on a <br />noise complaint. I am willing to take this group at their word that part of their bylaws would be <br />there are no electronic noise machines on site. <br />Tengler says it sounds like Rice would like conditions on the traffic and Louisville residents. <br />There doesn't sound like there is support for putting noise as a condition. Are you okay with <br />two? <br />Rice says it is an olive branch to the neighbors that the City will not allow noise. Why not make <br />noise abatement a condition? <br />Pritchard asks the Applicant if they are okay with the conditions to raise awareness of the <br />intersection, restriction on electronics and noise, and specifying this is for Louisville residents <br />and organizations. Also, as you are putting the lottery together, the notion of turnover so that a <br />plot is not held in perpetuity should be considered. <br />Mary Ann Heaney says they are comfortable with all three conditions. They also feel the lottery <br />and term limits for a plot are an excellent idea. <br />Tengler, Moline, O'Connell, and Russell are all in agreement. <br />Motion made by Rice to approve Community Garden: Resolution 24, Series 2015. A request <br />for a special review use (SRU) to allow for a community garden at the northeast and northwest <br />corners of Griffith and Lincoln, with four conditions, seconded by Tengler. Roll call vote. <br />Name I Vote <br />Chris Pritchard I Yes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.