My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 08 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 08 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:25:21 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/13/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 13, 2015 <br />Page 18 of 22 <br />133,000 sf and Fenix, a European company, has leased it 100%. The building running north - <br />south built 11-12 years ago is Fresca Foods who now occupies two buildings. We have <br />submitted to the City for another $2.5 million in tenant improvements for Fresca Foods for <br />additional manufacturing facilities on 1775 Cherry. The 2000 Taylor building mimics the Fenix <br />building. Our first rendering has been revised after comments from Public Works and Planning <br />and is included in your packet. One issue, because these buildings are very long, is grading <br />issues. The first grading plan submitted to the City came back with comments to reduce it. <br />There used to be another entrance at CTC Blvd. We eliminated that entrance, and were able to <br />drop the entire site elevation by 3'. This had a positive impact at 1041" in that the building came <br />down. Based on the drawings we have submitted, we have been approached by a very large <br />user to potentially lease the majority of this building. It is another food manufacturing company <br />that is currently in the Boulder market but wants to expand substantially. Our impact here is that <br />we try to minimize our off -site improvements and impacts along streets. As we built CTC with <br />our partner in the Metro District, we tried to take into account as many of the variables we could <br />and today, all of us are seeing the benefits of it. If you drive south on 104th, the City's new <br />service center is being constructed. We see this as a very positive situation. Coincidentally, this <br />building with permits and use tax and tap fees, just for the core and cell, will be about $1 million <br />of fees. Depending on what tenant occupies the building, the fees have an increased value in <br />permits. We are asking for your consideration of our request in both the rezoning and the PUD. <br />If, in fact, you are of a mind to grant us with the approval, we are prepared to go forth with the <br />building and get into the City for building permits to start construction this year. There are some <br />remarks about what we are doing with the property today. Currently, there is a large stockpile of <br />dirt. We are approaching 25' in height. We were able to enter into a transaction with Ames, the <br />general contractor building the majority of the 36 Corridor. We are providing them with a site for <br />excess material bringing off Highway 36 to store. We need it to build this facility. We did make <br />an application to the City, paid permits, and have erosion control measures in hand. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />Tengler asks compared to the Fenix building, what is the size of this building? Is it similar? <br />Vasbinder says this is about 120,000 sf and the other building is 133,000 sf. They are very <br />close. Depth of the building and length are very similar. <br />Public Comment: <br />None. <br />Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: <br />Staff recommends Planning Commission approve. Applicant none. <br />Closed Public Hearing and discussion by Commission: <br />Tengler in support. Tengler suggests that the "signage requirements issue" be considered and <br />put on the agenda. Moline in support. O'Connell in support. Russell in support. Rice in support. <br />Motion made by Russell to approve 2000 Taylor — GDP Amend and Final PUD: Resolution <br />23, Series 2015. A request for an amendment to the existing Business Center at CTC GDP for <br />a rezoning from PCZD-C, to PCZD-I, and a final planned unit development (PUD) plan for a <br />120,877 SF single story Industrial/Flex building with associated site improvements at Lot 1, <br />Block 4, the Business Center at CTC, seconded by O'Connell. Roll call vote. <br />Name <br />Vote <br />Chris Pritchard <br />Yes <br />Jeff Moline <br />Yes <br />Ann O'Connell <br />Yes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.