My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 10 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 10 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:32:32 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/8/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 8, 2015 <br />Page 15 of 23 <br />5. Staff requests sidewalk improvements be made along Dogwood Street and to access <br />the Brew Pub before this criterion can be met. <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Staff recommends Planning Commission move to approve of Climbing Gym/Brew Pub - <br />Resolution 32, Series 2015: A resolution recommending approval of a final planned unit <br />development (PUD) plan and special review use (SRU) to allow for the construction of a 24,282 <br />SF climbing gym and 4,071 SF brewpub in the Colorado Technology Center. <br />1. The applicant shall remove the proposed sign on the west elevation. <br />2. If parking shortages are demonstrated on the site, the applicant shall develop a shared <br />parking agreement with a neighboring property. <br />3. The applicant shall construct a sidewalk along Dogwood Street, from Cherry Street to <br />the mid -block access drive. Also, the sidewalk shall extend along the south side of the <br />access drive to the entrance of the Brew Pub. <br />Commission Questions of Staff: <br />Brauneis says that the previous application addressed manicured lawns. The IDDSG does have <br />guidelines or requirements for manicured lawns? <br />Trice says it does. I believe the majority of lawns should be manicured. It is not saying all lawns <br />should be manicured. <br />Brauneis asks about shared parking. The language says if parking shortages are demonstrated, <br />to whom and when? <br />Trice says one of the concerns from Staff is because it is a competition climbing wall, more <br />parking would need to be available for those types of competitions. The competitions would <br />likely occur at a time, such as weekends, when the surrounding parking is not being used by the <br />office and warehouses. <br />Russ says we have had this exact condition on a number of projects throughout the City and <br />also in the CTC where they have had landscaped areas that we said, if demonstrated parking <br />shortage exists, then you are required to add. People look at the PUD as a final site plan <br />approval. If we don't have that condition, then code enforcement is not empowered to resolve <br />problems. There are potential unknowns associated with events and other things. If there are <br />complaints and code enforcement is called, or Planning or Public Works are called, and <br />overflow parking or predominant on -street parking is associated with the project, this would be <br />the trigger to which we could come back and require shared parking. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Andy Johnson, DAJ Design, 922A Main Street, Louisville, CO <br />This is a unique project to the Colorado Tech Center. It offers something that is missing to a <br />growing community out in this area. There is no place to recreate and no place to eat. Most <br />businesses would agree that it is something desired. Those seemed to be the comments I heard <br />through the grapevine at the business association meeting when they reviewed this project. It <br />adds an exercise facility and adds a food and drink facility. The architecture supporting these <br />two types of businesses is dynamic in nature, representing the uniqueness of the businesses <br />that will occupy them. The building architecture is relatively simple; the forms definitely take a <br />different shape than what you typically find out at the CTC. The buildings are much smaller <br />than what you see at CTC as well. The Brew Pub is around 4,000 SF and the climbing gym is <br />around 24,000 SF, with only an 18,000 SF footprint from what you see at the CTC. The nature <br />of the climbing gym itself does not lend itself to a lot of architectural articulation. The walls rely <br />heavily on the structure itself. They are metal buildings and very simple in nature. The walls are <br />extraordinarily expensive to build so the building, in order to be economically viable, needs to be <br />simple and inexpensive. Steel building method was chosen as the type of construction which <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.