My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2016 08 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2016 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2016 08 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:30:52 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:37:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/11/2016
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 11, 2016 <br />Page 10 of 29 <br />Parcel O, the former Sam's Club Area <br />Figure 24: Level of Support for Housing Options for Former Sam's Club Area <br />Most of the land zoned for residential uses in Louisville has been built out. In the former Sam's Club shopping <br />area residential development is currently not allowed. Ifthis area was to redevelop with retail and offices, to <br />what extent would you support or oppose including any of the following types of housing? <br />■ Strongly support ■ Somewhat support ■ Somewhat oppose ■ Strongly oppose <br />Senior housing (apartments, condos, <br />townhomes) 29r/a <br />Multifamily housing (apartments, condos, <br />townhomes) <br />Subsidized housing (apartments, condos, <br />townhomes) <br />0% <br />25% ' <br />26% 20% 121/1 <br />7SA 100% <br />US 36/ McCaslin area/ Colony Square/Movie Theater/ BRT Station <br />Figure 25: Level of Support for Housing Options for US361mccaslin Area <br />In the area near the US36/McCaslin transitibus station residential development is currently not allowed. If this <br />area was to redevelop with retail and offices, to what extent would you support or oppose including any of the <br />fallowing types of housing? <br />■ Strongly support ■ Somewhat support ■ Somewhat oppose ■ Strongly oppose <br />Senior housing (apartments, condos, <br />townhomes) <br />Multifamily housing (apartments, condos, <br />townhomes) <br />Subsidized housing (apartments, condos, <br />townhomes) <br />o"/; 25,V, 500/6 75'A IGO% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.