My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2017 06 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2017 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2017 06 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:29:07 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:46:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/8/2017
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 8, 2017 <br />Page 10 of 27 <br />Andren-Wise says we are sheeting for LEED gold equivalency. We have done the energy <br />model to that effect and come up with a high performance building model. We are not certifying <br />it officially, but it has sustainable principles and checklists. <br />Hsu says in the material sheet, there is electrochromic glass listed. Is that going to be used <br />somewhere? <br />Andren-Wise says we are considering it as well as fritted glass. You will always be able to see <br />out, but it will provide shielding needed to deflect the western sun. It is the lowest U value which <br />is the highest value of rating you get for glare and heat absorption from the interior. <br />Hsu asks about parking. Is 3 spaces per 1000 SF good? <br />Andren-Wise says there is a different model for recreational facilities versus an office or retail <br />or industrial. Recreational centers are unique in that one user goes in and uses a lot of different <br />functions. In models, we usually see 2.5 spaces to 3.5 spaces considering the amount of trail <br />systems and patterns and how people access the building. We feel it is an adequate ratio. For <br />special events, shuttles can be used. This is a qualified ratio for a center of this size. <br />Hsu asks if you are okay with the sidewalk condition to extend it to Via Appia. <br />Andren-Wise says it will be a challenge. We have not figured out how it will happen. <br />Public Comment: <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 West Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO <br />I have lived in Louisville for almost 30 years and for 21 of them, I have been a minimum 5X a <br />week user of the Rec Center. It is a project I am familiar with. I also serve on the Task Force at <br />CC to assist Staff and the architects in designing both Memory Square, the Rec Center, and <br />Senior Center expansions. We have a 25 year old facility of about 57,000 SF. We are going to <br />add another 50,000 SF to it, and build a new facility that will serve this community for another 25 <br />years. In doing that, we are extensively refurbishing the existing building, footprint, and <br />equipment. The Task Force met 2X month from November to July. There were at least four, and <br />probably six, public open houses. There were meetings at CC and renderings all over the Rec <br />Center. There were extensive opportunities for public comment. When it was referred to the <br />ballot in July, a group of citizen volunteers organized the campaign for the election which <br />passed the two taxes necessary to construct and maintain this building. Those volunteers <br />worked from July until November. It has a year -long public process. The ballot issue for the <br />property tax passed 66%-34% as did the sales tax to revive the ongoing operation and <br />maintenance. There has been a long active public process to deliver this product to the <br />community. What we are here to do tonight is to make sure we are doing our due diligence in <br />complying with our standards. We are also here to deliver on a promise that has been made to <br />everybody who lives in Louisville. This is going to be a tremendous asset to the community and <br />something everyone can enjoy. The Senior Center is being expanded and renovated with an <br />eye to changing demographics. At the request of the Youth Advisory Board, we put attention <br />into the indoor -outdoor pool with patios to give a place for younger people to hang out in the <br />summer. We are providing areas for food trucks to provide concessions. It is a dazzling project <br />and worthy of your support. Like Chairman Pritchard, I have been here a long time. I have <br />never seen any kind of vehicular conflict where it is now proposed to be right -in, right -out across <br />from the Fire Department. That is a problem that is nonexistent. It is solution that might create <br />more problems than it solves. There has never been an accident there (and I checked). I have <br />never seen anybody do anything stupid there. Rarely do people heading westbound go past the <br />first entrance to make a left by the tennis courts, but people going out often make a left across <br />to go to McCaslin. It is not a heavily trafficked road. There is a HAWK signal just up the hill for a <br />pedestrian crossing. What it does is divert some traffic away from the main entrance where all <br />the little kids are running and where the seniors are getting in and out of vans. I think it is a <br />safety enhancement to provide a second outflow area. I wouldn't change a thing. I urge your <br />support for this project. It will be a great gift to the community. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.