Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 14, 2017 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />Code regarding mobile retail food establishments, mobile food vehicles, mobile vending carts, <br />and ice cream vendor regulations. <br />O'Connell asked the Commission for questions of the staff. <br />Rice asked about the city -sponsored event exemption. <br />Ritchie responded that city -sponsored vendors already have a high number of permit <br />requirements and have to work directly with the city. <br />Rice stated that he was concerned that at city -sponsored events that vendors might show up <br />and try to operate without a permit. He stated that the original intent had wanted to bring order <br />to sponsored events. <br />Zuccaro replied that the intent of the staff was the food truck at the event would already be <br />registered in that city. <br />Rice stated that the language needed to make that clear to avoid this issue. <br />Ritchie stated that staff would check the wording and make this very clear. <br />Moline asked if there were any operational requirements that staff would change. <br />Ritchie stated that as they had been administering the operational aspects of the ordinances, no <br />big issues has come up. <br />Hsu asked about the 150 feet requirement in the original ordinances. <br />Ritchie stated that they left that language alone. <br />Hsu responded that the 150-feet measurement and the "radius" language is unclear. He <br />proposed something like, "the distance shall be the shortest measurement based on the <br />property perimeter or lot line." <br />O'Connell asked for public comment. Seeing none, she closed public comment period. <br />O'Connell stated that they would discuss the resolution with the two issues in mind — the 150- <br />feet language and the language for city -sponsored events. <br />Motion made by Rice to approve Resolution 25 Series 2017 with two amendments, the first <br />dealing with the 150-feet language and the second with the permitting for city -sponsored events. <br />Seconded by Brauneis. Roll call vote. Motion passed unanimously. <br />DISCUSSION <br />Planning Commission Training Materials <br />Dean stated that the discussion was at the request of Commissioner Hsu. <br />Hsu stated that since there would be 3-4 new commissioners, the Commission should put <br />together a packet to tell them how the commission worked. Hsu stated that reading the CCDSG <br />and the IDDSG should not be a high priority for new commissioners. He requested that the <br />Commission address what to present to new members. <br />O'Connell asked staff to recommend professional planning documents for the packet. <br />