Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 14, 2017 <br />Page 8 of 9 <br />• Case Manager: Rob Zuccaro, Planning & Building Safety Director <br />Christ the Servant Lutheran Church (506 Via Appia): A request for a Special Review Use <br />to allow the construction of an exterior columbarium (SRU under use category 22. <br />Cemeteries) (SRU-0088-2017) <br />• Applicant: Christ the Servant Lutheran Church <br />• Owner: Christ the Servant Lutheran Church <br />• Case Manager: Lisa Ritchie, Associate Planner <br />Blue Parrot Landmark Sign (640 Main Street): A request for a PUD Amendment to <br />implement an exterior sign program for the property at 640 Main Street. <br />• Applicant: 1882 Ventures, LLC <br />• Owner: 1882 Ventures, LLC <br />• Case Manager: Lisa Ritchie, Associate Planner <br />Lot 7, Block 4, CTC #1 PUD (602 Taylor Avenue): An application for a PUD to allow the <br />construction of a 19,509 SF building and associated site improvements for a flex <br />industrial building. <br />• Applicant: Chuck Ogsbury <br />• Owner: Motherlode Bldg, LLC <br />• Case Manager: Lisa Ritchie, Associate Planner <br />Zuccaro stated that it was possible that the upcoming applications could be ready by January <br />11th. He added that the proposed meetings section in the agenda was confusing people who <br />thought those were on that night's agenda. <br />Brauneis stated that he was worried it might look like the Commission was trying to hide <br />information from the public if they removed the planned agenda. <br />Zuccaro stated that the applications in development were all online, but there might be <br />something lost in not including them on the agenda. He added that there were a number of <br />applicants that did not make their initial public hearing deadlines and that including the tentative <br />items on the agenda had confused some members of the public. The presentation schedule <br />was dictated by when the applicant began the process. He added that the tentative items were <br />included for the Commission. Staff could email a list of active applications to commissioners or <br />use a hyperlink option. <br />Hsu stated he did not find the list particularly helpful. <br />Brauneis, Rice, and Sheets said the list was helpful to them. <br />Rice added that he would support a way to make the agenda easier to understand. <br />Sheets recommended using a page break on agendas of more than one page. <br />Rice asked for an update on the design guidelines panel. <br />Dean stated that staff selected Russell + Mills and City Council approved their contract on <br />November 281h. Public meetings were slated for February and staff would provide more <br />information at the January meeting. <br />Brauneis asked about adopting findings, which the Commission did not generally do. He stated <br />it felt efficient, but previously they would approve conditions for approval. <br />Zuccaro responded that conditions were meant to be articulated specifically and verbatim. <br />